Revert "btrfs: avoid monopolizing a core when activating a swap file"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This reverts commit 3d770d44dd5c6316913b003790998404636ec2a8.

The backport for linux-5.4.y, commit 3d770d44dd5c ("btrfs: avoid
monopolizing a core when activating a swap file"), inserted
cond_resched() in the wrong location.

Revert it now; a subsequent commit will re-backport the original patch.

Fixes: 3d770d44dd5c ("btrfs: avoid monopolizing a core when activating a swap file") # linux-5.4.y
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7679,8 +7679,6 @@ noinline int can_nocow_extent(struct ino
 			ret = -EAGAIN;
 			goto out;
 		}
-
-		cond_resched();
 	}
 
 	btrfs_release_path(path);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from koichiro.den@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.4/revert-btrfs-avoid-monopolizing-a-core-when-activating-a-swap-file.patch
queue-5.4/btrfs-avoid-monopolizing-a-core-when-activating-a-swap-file.patch




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux