Patch "io_uring/waitid: don't abuse io_tw_state" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    io_uring/waitid: don't abuse io_tw_state

to the 6.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     io_uring-waitid-don-t-abuse-io_tw_state.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 559786c2195180f8e8cd8d194b3bd4985076dab3
Author: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Feb 12 13:33:24 2025 +0000

    io_uring/waitid: don't abuse io_tw_state
    
    [ Upstream commit 06521ac0485effdcc9c792cb0b40ed8e6f2f5fb8 ]
    
    struct io_tw_state is managed by core io_uring, and opcode handling code
    must never try to cheat and create their own instances, it's plain
    incorrect.
    
    io_waitid_complete() attempts exactly that outside of the task work
    context, and even though the ring is locked, there would be no one to
    reap the requests from the defer completion list. It only works now
    because luckily it's called before io_uring_try_cancel_uring_cmd(),
    which flushes completions.
    
    Fixes: f31ecf671ddc4 ("io_uring: add IORING_OP_WAITID support")
    Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/io_uring/waitid.c b/io_uring/waitid.c
index daef5dd644f04..eddd2dffc88b6 100644
--- a/io_uring/waitid.c
+++ b/io_uring/waitid.c
@@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ static int io_waitid_finish(struct io_kiocb *req, int ret)
 static void io_waitid_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, int ret)
 {
 	struct io_waitid *iw = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_waitid);
-	struct io_tw_state ts = {};
 
 	/* anyone completing better be holding a reference */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&iw->refs) & IO_WAITID_REF_MASK));
@@ -131,7 +130,6 @@ static void io_waitid_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, int ret)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		req_set_fail(req);
 	io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
-	io_req_task_complete(req, &ts);
 }
 
 static bool __io_waitid_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req)
@@ -153,6 +151,7 @@ static bool __io_waitid_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req)
 	list_del_init(&iwa->wo.child_wait.entry);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&iw->head->lock);
 	io_waitid_complete(req, -ECANCELED);
+	io_req_queue_tw_complete(req, -ECANCELED);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -258,6 +257,7 @@ static void io_waitid_cb(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts)
 	}
 
 	io_waitid_complete(req, ret);
+	io_req_task_complete(req, ts);
 }
 
 static int io_waitid_wait(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode,




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux