This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
selftests: harness: fix printing of mismatch values in __EXPECT()
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
selftests-harness-fix-printing-of-mismatch-values-in.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 6beab5e8950c9702fee4eacb3c8ba4de0c55b733
Author: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jan 8 19:07:57 2025 +0200
selftests: harness: fix printing of mismatch values in __EXPECT()
[ Upstream commit 02bc220dc6dc7c56edc4859bc5dd2c08b95d5fb5 ]
intptr_t and uintptr_t are not big enough types on 32-bit architectures
when printing 64-bit values, resulting to the following incorrect
diagnostic output:
# get_syscall_info.c:209:get_syscall_info:Expected exp_args[2] (3134324433) == info.entry.args[1] (3134324433)
Replace intptr_t and uintptr_t with intmax_t and uintmax_t, respectively.
With this fix, the same test produces more usable diagnostic output:
# get_syscall_info.c:209:get_syscall_info:Expected exp_args[2] (3134324433) == info.entry.args[1] (18446744072548908753)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108170757.GA6723@xxxxxxxxx
Fixes: b5bb6d3068ea ("selftests/seccomp: fix 32-bit build warnings")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
index f393fe8cf3725..9465f1aca2af6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
@@ -614,33 +614,33 @@
/* Report with actual signedness to avoid weird output. */ \
switch (is_signed_type(__exp) * 2 + is_signed_type(__seen)) { \
case 0: { \
- unsigned long long __exp_print = (uintptr_t)__exp; \
- unsigned long long __seen_print = (uintptr_t)__seen; \
- __TH_LOG("Expected %s (%llu) %s %s (%llu)", \
+ uintmax_t __exp_print = (uintmax_t)__exp; \
+ uintmax_t __seen_print = (uintmax_t)__seen; \
+ __TH_LOG("Expected %s (%ju) %s %s (%ju)", \
_expected_str, __exp_print, #_t, \
_seen_str, __seen_print); \
break; \
} \
case 1: { \
- unsigned long long __exp_print = (uintptr_t)__exp; \
- long long __seen_print = (intptr_t)__seen; \
- __TH_LOG("Expected %s (%llu) %s %s (%lld)", \
+ uintmax_t __exp_print = (uintmax_t)__exp; \
+ intmax_t __seen_print = (intmax_t)__seen; \
+ __TH_LOG("Expected %s (%ju) %s %s (%jd)", \
_expected_str, __exp_print, #_t, \
_seen_str, __seen_print); \
break; \
} \
case 2: { \
- long long __exp_print = (intptr_t)__exp; \
- unsigned long long __seen_print = (uintptr_t)__seen; \
- __TH_LOG("Expected %s (%lld) %s %s (%llu)", \
+ intmax_t __exp_print = (intmax_t)__exp; \
+ uintmax_t __seen_print = (uintmax_t)__seen; \
+ __TH_LOG("Expected %s (%jd) %s %s (%ju)", \
_expected_str, __exp_print, #_t, \
_seen_str, __seen_print); \
break; \
} \
case 3: { \
- long long __exp_print = (intptr_t)__exp; \
- long long __seen_print = (intptr_t)__seen; \
- __TH_LOG("Expected %s (%lld) %s %s (%lld)", \
+ intmax_t __exp_print = (intmax_t)__exp; \
+ intmax_t __seen_print = (intmax_t)__seen; \
+ __TH_LOG("Expected %s (%jd) %s %s (%jd)", \
_expected_str, __exp_print, #_t, \
_seen_str, __seen_print); \
break; \
