This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled io_uring/tctx: work around xa_store() allocation error issue to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: io_uring-tctx-work-around-xa_store-allocation-error-.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 03068f9d622cb9e2925a4b509f0d1401c99241ed Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Nov 29 07:20:28 2024 -0700 io_uring/tctx: work around xa_store() allocation error issue [ Upstream commit 7eb75ce7527129d7f1fee6951566af409a37a1c4 ] syzbot triggered the following WARN_ON: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at io_uring/tctx.c:51 __io_uring_free+0xfa/0x140 io_uring/tctx.c:51 which is the WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_empty(&tctx->xa)); sanity check in __io_uring_free() when a io_uring_task is going through its final put. The syzbot test case includes injecting memory allocation failures, and it very much looks like xa_store() can fail one of its memory allocations and end up with ->head being non-NULL even though no entries exist in the xarray. Until this issue gets sorted out, work around it by attempting to iterate entries in our xarray, and WARN_ON_ONCE() if one is found. Reported-by: syzbot+cc36d44ec9f368e443d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/673c1643.050a0220.87769.0066.GAE@xxxxxxxxxx/ Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.c b/io_uring/tctx.c index c043fe93a3f23..84f6a83857204 100644 --- a/io_uring/tctx.c +++ b/io_uring/tctx.c @@ -47,8 +47,19 @@ static struct io_wq *io_init_wq_offload(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __io_uring_free(struct task_struct *tsk) { struct io_uring_task *tctx = tsk->io_uring; + struct io_tctx_node *node; + unsigned long index; - WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_empty(&tctx->xa)); + /* + * Fault injection forcing allocation errors in the xa_store() path + * can lead to xa_empty() returning false, even though no actual + * node is stored in the xarray. Until that gets sorted out, attempt + * an iteration here and warn if any entries are found. + */ + xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, node) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + break; + } WARN_ON_ONCE(tctx->io_wq); WARN_ON_ONCE(tctx->cached_refs);