Patch "rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count unsigned long long" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count unsigned long long

to the 6.12-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     rtla-timerlat-make-timerlat_top_cpu-_count-unsigned-.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.12 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 05f3df905838daf622a78596893aa8c741f491ff
Author: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Oct 11 14:10:14 2024 +0200

    rtla/timerlat: Make timerlat_top_cpu->*_count unsigned long long
    
    [ Upstream commit 4eba4723c5254ba8251ecb7094a5078d5c300646 ]
    
    Most fields of struct timerlat_top_cpu are unsigned long long, but the
    fields {irq,thread,user}_count are int (32-bit signed).
    
    This leads to overflow when tracing on a large number of CPUs for a long
    enough time:
    $ rtla timerlat top -a20 -c 1-127 -d 12h
    ...
      0 12:00:00   |          IRQ Timer Latency (us)        |         Thread Timer Latency (us)
    CPU COUNT      |      cur       min       avg       max |      cur       min       avg       max
     1 #43200096  |        0         0         1         2 |        3         2         6        12
    ...
    127 #43200096  |        0         0         1         2 |        3         2         5        11
    ALL #119144 e4 |                  0         5         4 |                  2        28        16
    
    The average latency should be 0-1 for IRQ and 5-6 for thread, but is
    reported as 5 and 28, about 4 to 5 times more, due to the count
    overflowing when summed over all CPUs: 43200096 * 127 = 5486412192,
    however, 1191444898 (= 5486412192 mod MAX_INT) is reported instead, as
    seen on the last line of the output, and the averages are thus ~4.6
    times higher than they should be (5486412192 / 1191444898 = ~4.6).
    
    Fix the issue by changing {irq,thread,user}_count fields to unsigned
    long long, similarly to other fields in struct timerlat_top_cpu and to
    the count variable in timerlat_top_print_sum.
    
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241011121015.2868751-1-tglozar@xxxxxxxxxx
    Reported-by: Attila Fazekas <afazekas@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
index 3b62519a412fc..ac2ff38a57ee5 100644
--- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
+++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/timerlat_top.c
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ struct timerlat_top_params {
 };
 
 struct timerlat_top_cpu {
-	int			irq_count;
-	int			thread_count;
-	int			user_count;
+	unsigned long long	irq_count;
+	unsigned long long	thread_count;
+	unsigned long long	user_count;
 
 	unsigned long long	cur_irq;
 	unsigned long long	min_irq;
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void timerlat_top_print(struct osnoise_tool *top, int cpu)
 	/*
 	 * Unless trace is being lost, IRQ counter is always the max.
 	 */
-	trace_seq_printf(s, "%3d #%-9d |", cpu, cpu_data->irq_count);
+	trace_seq_printf(s, "%3d #%-9llu |", cpu, cpu_data->irq_count);
 
 	if (!cpu_data->irq_count) {
 		trace_seq_printf(s, "%s %s %s %s |", no_value, no_value, no_value, no_value);




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux