Patch "bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def" has been added to the 6.11-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def

to the 6.11-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bpf-sync_linked_regs-must-preserve-subreg_def.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.11 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit cdc3e4354d579cac65f644e226a8e79efe53cfb6
Author: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Sep 24 14:08:43 2024 -0700

    bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def
    
    [ Upstream commit e9bd9c498cb0f5843996dbe5cbce7a1836a83c70 ]
    
    Range propagation must not affect subreg_def marks, otherwise the
    following example is rewritten by verifier incorrectly when
    BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set:
    
      0: call bpf_ktime_get_ns                   call bpf_ktime_get_ns
      1: r0 &= 0x7fffffff       after verifier   r0 &= 0x7fffffff
      2: w1 = w0                rewrites         w1 = w0
      3: if w0 < 10 goto +0     -------------->  r11 = 0x2f5674a6     (r)
      4: r1 >>= 32                               r11 <<= 32           (r)
      5: r0 = r1                                 r1 |= r11            (r)
      6: exit;                                   if w0 < 0xa goto pc+0
                                                 r1 >>= 32
                                                 r0 = r1
                                                 exit
    
    (or zero extension of w1 at (2) is missing for architectures that
     require zero extension for upper register half).
    
    The following happens w/o this patch:
    - r0 is marked as not a subreg at (0);
    - w1 is marked as subreg at (2);
    - w1 subreg_def is overridden at (3) by copy_register_state();
    - w1 is read at (5) but mark_insn_zext() does not mark (2)
      for zero extension, because w1 subreg_def is not set;
    - because of BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag verifier inserts random
      value for hi32 bits of (2) (marked (r));
    - this random value is read at (5).
    
    Fixes: 75748837b7e5 ("bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.")
    Reported-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/7e2aa30a62d740db182c170fdd8f81c596df280d.camel@xxxxxxxxx
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240924210844.1758441-1-eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d5215cb1747f1..5c5dea5e137e7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -15140,8 +15140,12 @@ static void find_equal_scalars(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate,
 			continue;
 		if ((!(reg->id & BPF_ADD_CONST) && !(known_reg->id & BPF_ADD_CONST)) ||
 		    reg->off == known_reg->off) {
+			s32 saved_subreg_def = reg->subreg_def;
+
 			copy_register_state(reg, known_reg);
+			reg->subreg_def = saved_subreg_def;
 		} else {
+			s32 saved_subreg_def = reg->subreg_def;
 			s32 saved_off = reg->off;
 
 			fake_reg.type = SCALAR_VALUE;
@@ -15154,6 +15158,7 @@ static void find_equal_scalars(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate,
 			 * otherwise another find_equal_scalars() will be incorrect.
 			 */
 			reg->off = saved_off;
+			reg->subreg_def = saved_subreg_def;
 
 			scalar32_min_max_add(reg, &fake_reg);
 			scalar_min_max_add(reg, &fake_reg);




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux