On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 06:31:34PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Meanwhile, this was the only thing we needed to add malloc() => > kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL); and the lack of that means that now the Rust folks No, that's not true. For example, it doesn't cover: spin_lock(); set PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL); You'd want to additionally add the GFP_ATOMIC flags in there or you're going to get the extra failures.
