> > It may be prudent to drop this patch from all stable trees. In the > > best case, this patch doesn't change the behavior of the UFS Exynos driver. > > If anything would have been overlooked, there is a risk that this > > patch breaks the UFS Exynos driver. > > That kind of implies that this is a risky patch to be in Linus's tree right now. > Why was it marked for backporting to stable then? Why is it ok in 6.12-rc? > Why is the Fixes: tag wrong? The code is fixing an issue related to a Samsung quirk relevant to Exynos platforms. The stable tag was added because of this comment - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg198943.html It was tested by Google on a Pixel 6 that has an Exynos host controller - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg199490.html However, no one from Samsung acked it. Thanks, Avri > > confused, > > greg k-h
