From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit f0e3c14802515f60a47e6ef347ea59c2733402aa upstream. Use tid_geq to compare tids to work over sequence number wraps. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240801013815.2393869-2-shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/jbd2/journal.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c @@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ int jbd2_fc_begin_commit(journal_t *jour return -EINVAL; write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock); - if (tid <= journal->j_commit_sequence) { + if (tid_geq(journal->j_commit_sequence, tid)) { write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); return -EALREADY; } Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-6.11/jbd2-correctly-compare-tids-with-tid_geq-function-in-jbd2_fc_begin_commit.patch
