Re: Patch "ata: pata_serverworks: Do not use the term blacklist" has been added to the 6.11-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/6/24 18:18, Sasha Levin wrote:

> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> 
>     ata: pata_serverworks: Do not use the term blacklist
> 
> to the 6.11-stable tree which can be found at:
>     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> 
> The filename of the patch is:
>      ata-pata_serverworks-do-not-use-the-term-blacklist.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-6.11 subdirectory.
> 
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.

   Hm... again, what exactly does this commit fix? :-/

> commit 106fce3509096c391ee57d0482d1e857e3dfb6fb
> Author: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri Jul 26 10:58:36 2024 +0900
> 
>     ata: pata_serverworks: Do not use the term blacklist
>     
>     [ Upstream commit 858048568c9e3887d8b19e101ee72f129d65cb15 ]
>     
>     Let's not use the term blacklist in the function
>     serverworks_osb4_filter() documentation comment and rather simply refer
>     to what that function looks at: the list of devices with groken UDMA5.
>     
>     While at it, also constify the values of the csb_bad_ata100 array.
>     
>     Of note is that all of this should probably be handled using libata
>     quirk mechanism but it is unclear if these UDMA5 quirks are specific
>     to this controller only.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Reviewed-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c b/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
> index 549ff24a98231..4edddf6bcc150 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
> @@ -46,10 +46,11 @@
>  #define SVWKS_CSB5_REVISION_NEW	0x92 /* min PCI_REVISION_ID for UDMA5 (A2.0) */
>  #define SVWKS_CSB6_REVISION	0xa0 /* min PCI_REVISION_ID for UDMA4 (A1.0) */
>  
> -/* Seagate Barracuda ATA IV Family drives in UDMA mode 5
> - * can overrun their FIFOs when used with the CSB5 */
> -
> -static const char *csb_bad_ata100[] = {
> +/*
> + * Seagate Barracuda ATA IV Family drives in UDMA mode 5
> + * can overrun their FIFOs when used with the CSB5.
> + */
> +static const char * const csb_bad_ata100[] = {
>  	"ST320011A",
>  	"ST340016A",
>  	"ST360021A",
> @@ -163,10 +164,11 @@ static unsigned int serverworks_osb4_filter(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned in
>   *	@adev: ATA device
>   *	@mask: Mask of proposed modes
>   *
> - *	Check the blacklist and disable UDMA5 if matched
> + *	Check the list of devices with broken UDMA5 and
> + *	disable UDMA5 if matched.
>   */
> -
> -static unsigned int serverworks_csb_filter(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned int mask)
> +static unsigned int serverworks_csb_filter(struct ata_device *adev,
> +					   unsigned int mask)
>  {
>  	const char *p;
>  	char model_num[ATA_ID_PROD_LEN + 1];

MBR, Sergey





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux