From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 6758c1128ceb45d1a35298912b974eb4895b7dd9 upstream.
Instead of doing multiple tree walks, do one optimism range check with
lock hold, and exit if raced with another insertion. If a shadow exists,
check it with a new xas_get_order helper before releasing the lock to
avoid redundant tree walks for getting its order.
Drop the lock and do the allocation only if a split is needed.
In the best case, it only need to walk the tree once. If it needs to
alloc and split, 3 walks are issued (One for first ranged conflict check
and order retrieving, one for the second check after allocation, one for
the insert after split).
Testing with 4K pages, in an 8G cgroup, with 16G brd as block device:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap --rw=randread --time_based \
--ramp_time=30s --runtime=5m --group_reporting
Before:
bw ( MiB/s): min= 1027, max= 3520, per=100.00%, avg=2445.02, stdev=18.90, samples=8691
iops : min=263001, max=901288, avg=625924.36, stdev=4837.28, samples=8691
After (+7.3%):
bw ( MiB/s): min= 493, max= 3947, per=100.00%, avg=2625.56, stdev=25.74, samples=8651
iops : min=126454, max=1010681, avg=672142.61, stdev=6590.48, samples=8651
Test result with THP (do a THP randread then switch to 4K page in hope it
issues a lot of splitting):
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap -thp=1 --readonly \
--rw=randread --time_based --ramp_time=30s --runtime=10m \
--group_reporting
fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap \
--rw=randread --time_based --runtime=5s --group_reporting
Before:
bw ( KiB/s): min= 4141, max=14202, per=100.00%, avg=7935.51, stdev=96.85, samples=18976
iops : min= 1029, max= 3548, avg=1979.52, stdev=24.23, samples=18976·
READ: bw=4545B/s (4545B/s), 4545B/s-4545B/s (4545B/s-4545B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14419-14419msec
After (+12.5%):
bw ( KiB/s): min= 4611, max=15370, per=100.00%, avg=8928.74, stdev=105.17, samples=19146
iops : min= 1151, max= 3842, avg=2231.27, stdev=26.29, samples=19146
READ: bw=4635B/s (4635B/s), 4635B/s-4635B/s (4635B/s-4635B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14137-14137msec
The performance is better for both 4K (+7.5%) and THP (+12.5%) cached read.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240415171857.19244-5-ryncsn@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/A5A976CB-DB57-4513-A700-656580488AB6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[ kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx: minor adjustment of variable declarations ]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/test_xarray.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/filemap.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/test_xarray.c
+++ b/lib/test_xarray.c
@@ -1789,6 +1789,64 @@ static noinline void check_xas_get_order
}
}
+static noinline void check_xas_conflict_get_order(struct xarray *xa)
+{
+ XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
+
+ void *entry;
+ int only_once;
+ unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 20 : 1;
+ unsigned int order;
+ unsigned long i, j, k;
+
+ for (order = 0; order < max_order; order++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+ xas_set_order(&xas, i << order, order);
+ do {
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(i));
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+ } while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure xas_get_order works with xas_for_each_conflict.
+ */
+ j = i << order;
+ for (k = 0; k < order; k++) {
+ only_once = 0;
+ xas_set_order(&xas, j + (1 << k), k);
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_value(i));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_get_order(&xas) != order);
+ only_once++;
+ }
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, only_once != 1);
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+ }
+
+ if (order < max_order - 1) {
+ only_once = 0;
+ xas_set_order(&xas, (i & ~1UL) << order, order + 1);
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_value(i));
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_get_order(&xas) != order);
+ only_once++;
+ }
+ XA_BUG_ON(xa, only_once != 1);
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+ }
+
+ xas_set_order(&xas, i << order, order);
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ xas_store(&xas, NULL);
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+
static noinline void check_destroy(struct xarray *xa)
{
unsigned long index;
@@ -1839,6 +1897,7 @@ static int xarray_checks(void)
check_multi_store(&array);
check_get_order(&array);
check_xas_get_order(&array);
+ check_xas_conflict_get_order(&array);
check_xa_alloc();
check_find(&array);
check_find_entry(&array);
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -841,6 +841,8 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct
{
XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, index);
int huge = folio_test_hugetlb(folio);
+ void *alloced_shadow = NULL;
+ int alloced_order = 0;
bool charged = false;
long nr = 1;
@@ -863,16 +865,10 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct
folio->mapping = mapping;
folio->index = xas.xa_index;
- do {
- unsigned int order = xa_get_order(xas.xa, xas.xa_index);
+ for (;;) {
+ int order = -1, split_order = 0;
void *entry, *old = NULL;
- if (order > folio_order(folio)) {
- xas_split_alloc(&xas, xa_load(xas.xa, xas.xa_index),
- order, gfp);
- if (xas_error(&xas))
- goto error;
- }
xas_lock_irq(&xas);
xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
old = entry;
@@ -880,19 +876,33 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct
xas_set_err(&xas, -EEXIST);
goto unlock;
}
+ /*
+ * If a larger entry exists,
+ * it will be the first and only entry iterated.
+ */
+ if (order == -1)
+ order = xas_get_order(&xas);
+ }
+
+ /* entry may have changed before we re-acquire the lock */
+ if (alloced_order && (old != alloced_shadow || order != alloced_order)) {
+ xas_destroy(&xas);
+ alloced_order = 0;
}
if (old) {
- if (shadowp)
- *shadowp = old;
- /* entry may have been split before we acquired lock */
- order = xa_get_order(xas.xa, xas.xa_index);
- if (order > folio_order(folio)) {
+ if (order > 0 && order > folio_order(folio)) {
/* How to handle large swap entries? */
BUG_ON(shmem_mapping(mapping));
+ if (!alloced_order) {
+ split_order = order;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
xas_split(&xas, old, order);
xas_reset(&xas);
}
+ if (shadowp)
+ *shadowp = old;
}
xas_store(&xas, folio);
@@ -908,9 +918,24 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct
__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio,
NR_FILE_THPS, nr);
}
+
unlock:
xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
- } while (xas_nomem(&xas, gfp));
+
+ /* split needed, alloc here and retry. */
+ if (split_order) {
+ xas_split_alloc(&xas, old, split_order, gfp);
+ if (xas_error(&xas))
+ goto error;
+ alloced_shadow = old;
+ alloced_order = split_order;
+ xas_reset(&xas);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (!xas_nomem(&xas, gfp))
+ break;
+ }
if (xas_error(&xas))
goto error;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ryncsn@xxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.1/lib-xarray-introduce-a-new-helper-xas_get_order.patch
queue-6.1/mm-filemap-optimize-filemap-folio-adding.patch
queue-6.1/mm-filemap-return-early-if-failed-to-allocate-memory-for-split.patch
