On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 09:29:45AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/1/24 09:03, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 08:56:43AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On 10/1/24 08:45, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 08:43:05AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > >>>> On 9/30/24 21:56, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > >>>>> This is not stable material and I didn't mark it as such. Do not backport. > >>>> > >>>> The way selftest work is they just skip if a feature isn't supported. > >>>> As such this test should run gracefully on stable releases. > >>>> > >>>> I would say backport unless and skip if the feature isn't supported. > >>> > >>> Nonsense. 6.11 never returns ENOSYS from vDSO. This doesn't make sense. > >> > >> Not sure what you mean by Nonsense. ENOSYS can be used to skip?? > > > > The branch that this patch adds will never be reached in 6.11 because > > the kernel does not have the corresponding code. > > What should/would happen if this test is run on a kernel that doesn't > support the feature? The build system doesn't compile it for kernels without the feature.
