This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
xen/swiotlb: add alignment check for dma buffers
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
xen-swiotlb-add-alignment-check-for-dma-buffers.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit ec73dec4d295072345aa03ce914eb63919632dd8
Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Sep 13 12:05:02 2024 +0200
xen/swiotlb: add alignment check for dma buffers
[ Upstream commit 9f40ec84a7976d95c34e7cc070939deb103652b0 ]
When checking a memory buffer to be consecutive in machine memory,
the alignment needs to be checked, too. Failing to do so might result
in DMA memory not being aligned according to its requested size,
leading to error messages like:
4xxx 0000:2b:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
4xxx 0000:2b:00.0: Ring address not aligned
4xxx 0000:2b:00.0: Failed to initialise service qat_crypto
4xxx 0000:2b:00.0: Resetting device qat_dev0
4xxx: probe of 0000:2b:00.0 failed with error -14
Fixes: 9435cce87950 ("xen/swiotlb: Add support for 64KB page granularity")
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index ad3ee4857e154..000d02ea4f7d8 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -91,9 +91,15 @@ static inline int range_straddles_page_boundary(phys_addr_t p, size_t size)
{
unsigned long next_bfn, xen_pfn = XEN_PFN_DOWN(p);
unsigned int i, nr_pages = XEN_PFN_UP(xen_offset_in_page(p) + size);
+ phys_addr_t algn = 1ULL << (get_order(size) + PAGE_SHIFT);
next_bfn = pfn_to_bfn(xen_pfn);
+ /* If buffer is physically aligned, ensure DMA alignment. */
+ if (IS_ALIGNED(p, algn) &&
+ !IS_ALIGNED((phys_addr_t)next_bfn << XEN_PAGE_SHIFT, algn))
+ return 1;
+
for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++)
if (pfn_to_bfn(++xen_pfn) != ++next_bfn)
return 1;
