Patch "leds: pca995x: Fix device child node usage in pca995x_probe()" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree

[Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    leds: pca995x: Fix device child node usage in pca995x_probe()

to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     leds-pca995x-fix-device-child-node-usage-in-pca995x_.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 7229c3504388cc1e57571e2087dcec32cc09badf
Author: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Aug 7 15:37:03 2024 +0200

    leds: pca995x: Fix device child node usage in pca995x_probe()
    
    [ Upstream commit 82c5ada1f9d05902a4ccb926c7ce34e2fe699283 ]
    
    The current implementation accesses the `child` fwnode handle outside of
    device_for_each_child_node() without incrementing its refcount.
    
    Add the missing call to `fwnode_handle_get(child)`.
    
    The cleanup process where `child` is accessed is not right either
    because a single call to `fwnode_handle_put()` is carried out in case of
    an error, ignoring unasigned nodes at the point when the error happens.
    
    Keep `child` inside of the first loop, and use the helper pointer that
    receives references via `fwnode_handle_get()` to handle the child nodes
    within the second loop. Keeping `child` inside the first node has also
    the advantage that the scoped version of the loop can be used.
    
    Fixes: ee4e80b2962e ("leds: pca995x: Add support for PCA995X chips")
    Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807-leds-pca995x-fix-fwnode-usage-v1-1-8057c84dc583@xxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pca995x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pca995x.c
index 83bc9669544c3..11c7bb69573e8 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca995x.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca995x.c
@@ -120,12 +120,11 @@ static const struct regmap_config pca995x_regmap = {
 static int pca995x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct fwnode_handle *led_fwnodes[PCA995X_MAX_OUTPUTS] = { 0 };
-	struct fwnode_handle *child;
 	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
 	const struct pca995x_chipdef *chipdef;
 	struct pca995x_chip *chip;
 	struct pca995x_led *led;
-	int i, reg, ret;
+	int i, j, reg, ret;
 
 	chipdef = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
 
@@ -143,7 +142,7 @@ static int pca995x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 	i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);
 
-	device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
+	device_for_each_child_node_scoped(dev, child) {
 		ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -152,7 +151,7 @@ static int pca995x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		led = &chip->leds[reg];
-		led_fwnodes[reg] = child;
+		led_fwnodes[reg] = fwnode_handle_get(child);
 		led->chip = chip;
 		led->led_no = reg;
 		led->ldev.brightness_set_blocking = pca995x_brightness_set;
@@ -171,7 +170,8 @@ static int pca995x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 						     &chip->leds[i].ldev,
 						     &init_data);
 		if (ret < 0) {
-			fwnode_handle_put(child);
+			for (j = i; j < PCA995X_MAX_OUTPUTS; j++)
+				fwnode_handle_put(led_fwnodes[j]);
 			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
 					     "Could not register LED %s\n",
 					     chip->leds[i].ldev.name);