Patch "apparmor: fix policy_unpack_test on big endian systems" has been added to the 6.10-stable tree

[Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    apparmor: fix policy_unpack_test on big endian systems

to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     apparmor-fix-policy_unpack_test-on-big-endian-system.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit f5d435fe1786060ffd9ec336063376b09d705e18
Author: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Aug 8 08:50:03 2024 -0700

    apparmor: fix policy_unpack_test on big endian systems
    
    [ Upstream commit 98c0cc48e27e9d269a3e4db2acd72b486c88ec77 ]
    
    policy_unpack_test fails on big endian systems because data byte order
    is expected to be little endian but is generated in host byte order.
    This results in test failures such as:
    
     # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:150
        Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
            array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
            (u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
        # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
        not ok 3 policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name
        # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:164
        Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
            array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
            (u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
        # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
    
    Add the missing endianness conversions when generating test data.
    
    Fixes: 4d944bcd4e73 ("apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack")
    Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
index 5c9bde25e56df..2b8003eb4f463 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
@@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ static struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1;
 	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_U32_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 	*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1) = AA_U32;
-	*((u32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U32_DATA;
+	*((__le32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le32(TEST_U32_DATA);
 
 	buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET;
 	*buf = AA_NAME;
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1;
 	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_U64_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 	*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1) = AA_U64;
-	*((u64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U64_DATA;
+	*((__le64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le64(TEST_U64_DATA);
 
 	buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET;
 	*buf = AA_NAME;
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
 	*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1;
 	strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_ARRAY_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
 	*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1) = AA_ARRAY;
-	*((u16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_ARRAY_SIZE;
+	*((__le16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le16(TEST_ARRAY_SIZE);
 
 	return e;
 }