On 15/08/2024 11:26, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On 15/08/2024 10:39, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> >>> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled >>> >>> mptcp: fully established after ADD_ADDR echo on MPJ >> >> Thank you for having queued all my patches! >> >> (...) >> >>> From stable+bounces-67432-greg=kroah.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Aug 13 11:07:51 2024 >>> From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> (...) >> >>> Message-ID: <20240813090606.939542-2-matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> commit d67c5649c1541dc93f202eeffc6f49220a4ed71d upstream. >> >> (...) >> >>> Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from kroah.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are >>> >>> queue-6.1/nfsd-remove-nfsd_stats-make-th_cnt-a-global-counter.patch >>> queue-6.1/nfsd-move-reply-cache-initialization-into-nfsd-startup.patch >>> queue-6.1/sunrpc-remove-pg_stats-from-svc_program.patch >>> queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-don-t-try-to-create-sf-if-alloc-failed.patch >>> queue-6.1/nfsd-rename-nfsd_reply_cache_alloc.patch >> >> I don't know if you already noticed this before, but when you apply a >> patch sent to the stable mailing-list, the first 'From' is a different >> email address, and the script lists unrelated patches at the end. It >> looks like it is not new, and it is not an issue for me, but I thought >> you might want to know that. > > Odd, no, I haven't noticed that, thanks. I'll dig to figure out what > happened here... It looks like it is not new, I found a similar behaviour in the following email from January 2023: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1673528170713@xxxxxxxxx/ Cheers, Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
