From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 133f4c00b8b2bfcacead9b81e7e8edfceb4b06c4 upstream.
Sometimes, when a packet is received on channel A at almost the same time
as a packet is about to be transmitted on channel B, we observe with a
logic analyzer that the received packet on channel A is transmitted on
channel B. In other words, the Tx buffer data on channel B is corrupted
with data from channel A.
The problem appeared since commit 4409df5866b7 ("serial: sc16is7xx: change
EFR lock to operate on each channels"), which changed the EFR locking to
operate on each channel instead of chip-wise.
This commit has introduced a regression, because the EFR lock is used not
only to protect the EFR registers access, but also, in a very obscure and
undocumented way, to protect access to the data buffer, which is shared by
the Tx and Rx handlers, but also by each channel of the IC.
Fix this regression first by switching to kfifo_out_linear_ptr() in
sc16is7xx_handle_tx() to eliminate the need for a shared Rx/Tx buffer.
Secondly, replace the chip-wise Rx buffer with a separate Rx buffer for
each channel.
Fixes: 4409df5866b7 ("serial: sc16is7xx: change EFR lock to operate on each channels")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240723125302.1305372-2-hugo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
@@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ struct sc16is7xx_one {
struct kthread_work reg_work;
struct kthread_delayed_work ms_work;
struct sc16is7xx_one_config config;
+ unsigned char buf[SC16IS7XX_FIFO_SIZE]; /* Rx buffer. */
unsigned int old_mctrl;
u8 old_lcr; /* Value before EFR access. */
bool irda_mode;
@@ -339,7 +340,6 @@ struct sc16is7xx_port {
unsigned long gpio_valid_mask;
#endif
u8 mctrl_mask;
- unsigned char buf[SC16IS7XX_FIFO_SIZE];
struct kthread_worker kworker;
struct task_struct *kworker_task;
struct sc16is7xx_one p[];
@@ -611,18 +611,18 @@ static int sc16is7xx_set_baud(struct uar
static void sc16is7xx_handle_rx(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int rxlen,
unsigned int iir)
{
- struct sc16is7xx_port *s = dev_get_drvdata(port->dev);
+ struct sc16is7xx_one *one = to_sc16is7xx_one(port, port);
unsigned int lsr = 0, bytes_read, i;
bool read_lsr = (iir == SC16IS7XX_IIR_RLSE_SRC) ? true : false;
u8 ch, flag;
- if (unlikely(rxlen >= sizeof(s->buf))) {
+ if (unlikely(rxlen >= sizeof(one->buf))) {
dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
"ttySC%i: Possible RX FIFO overrun: %d\n",
port->line, rxlen);
port->icount.buf_overrun++;
/* Ensure sanity of RX level */
- rxlen = sizeof(s->buf);
+ rxlen = sizeof(one->buf);
}
while (rxlen) {
@@ -635,10 +635,10 @@ static void sc16is7xx_handle_rx(struct u
lsr = 0;
if (read_lsr) {
- s->buf[0] = sc16is7xx_port_read(port, SC16IS7XX_RHR_REG);
+ one->buf[0] = sc16is7xx_port_read(port, SC16IS7XX_RHR_REG);
bytes_read = 1;
} else {
- sc16is7xx_fifo_read(port, s->buf, rxlen);
+ sc16is7xx_fifo_read(port, one->buf, rxlen);
bytes_read = rxlen;
}
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static void sc16is7xx_handle_rx(struct u
}
for (i = 0; i < bytes_read; ++i) {
- ch = s->buf[i];
+ ch = one->buf[i];
if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, ch))
continue;
@@ -689,10 +689,10 @@ static void sc16is7xx_handle_rx(struct u
static void sc16is7xx_handle_tx(struct uart_port *port)
{
- struct sc16is7xx_port *s = dev_get_drvdata(port->dev);
struct tty_port *tport = &port->state->port;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int txlen;
+ unsigned char *tail;
if (unlikely(port->x_char)) {
sc16is7xx_port_write(port, SC16IS7XX_THR_REG, port->x_char);
@@ -717,8 +717,9 @@ static void sc16is7xx_handle_tx(struct u
txlen = 0;
}
- txlen = uart_fifo_out(port, s->buf, txlen);
- sc16is7xx_fifo_write(port, s->buf, txlen);
+ txlen = kfifo_out_linear_ptr(&tport->xmit_fifo, &tail, txlen);
+ sc16is7xx_fifo_write(port, tail, txlen);
+ uart_xmit_advance(port, txlen);
uart_port_lock_irqsave(port, &flags);
if (kfifo_len(&tport->xmit_fifo) < WAKEUP_CHARS)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from hvilleneuve@xxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.10/serial-sc16is7xx-fix-tx-fifo-corruption.patch
queue-6.10/serial-sc16is7xx-fix-invalid-fifo-access-with-special-register-set.patch
