Fix userfaultfd_api to return EINVAL as expected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Audra Mitchell <audra@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 1723f04caacb32cadc4e063725d836a0c4450694 upstream.

Currently if we request a feature that is not set in the Kernel config we
fail silently and return all the available features.  However, the man
page indicates we should return an EINVAL.

We need to fix this issue since we can end up with a Kernel warning should
a program request the feature UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED on a kernel with
the config not set with this feature.

 [  200.812896] WARNING: CPU: 91 PID: 13634 at mm/memory.c:1660 zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660
 [  200.820738] Modules linked in:
 [  200.869387] CPU: 91 PID: 13634 Comm: userfaultfd Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5+ #8
 [  200.877477] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R6525/0N7YGH, BIOS 2.7.3 03/30/2022
 [  200.885052] RIP: 0010:zap_pte_range+0x43d/0x660

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240626130513.120193-1-audra@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: e06f1e1dd499 ("userfaultfd: wp: enabled write protection in userfaultfd API")
Signed-off-by: Audra Mitchell <audra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <raquini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/userfaultfd.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_api(struct userfa
 		goto out;
 	features = uffdio_api.features;
 	ret = -EINVAL;
-	if (uffdio_api.api != UFFD_API || (features & ~UFFD_API_FEATURES))
+	if (uffdio_api.api != UFFD_API)
 		goto err_out;
 	ret = -EPERM;
 	if ((features & UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK) && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
@@ -2077,6 +2077,11 @@ static int userfaultfd_api(struct userfa
 	uffdio_api.features &= ~UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED;
 	uffdio_api.features &= ~UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC;
 #endif
+
+	ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (features & ~uffdio_api.features)
+		goto err_out;
+
 	uffdio_api.ioctls = UFFD_API_IOCTLS;
 	ret = -EFAULT;
 	if (copy_to_user(buf, &uffdio_api, sizeof(uffdio_api)))


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from audra@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-6.9/fix-userfaultfd_api-to-return-einval-as-expected.patch




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux