From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit f01af3022d4a46362c5dda3d35dea939f3246d10 upstream.
"Failed to lock the clock" is an appropriate error message for
clk_rate_exclusive_get() failing, but not for the clock running too
fast for the driver's calculations.
Adapt the error message accordingly.
Fixes: d44d635635a7 ("pwm: stm32: Fix for settings using period > UINT32_MAX")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/285182163211203fc823a65b180761f46e828dcb.1718979150.git.u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
@@ -679,7 +679,8 @@ static int stm32_pwm_probe(struct platfo
* .apply() won't overflow.
*/
if (clk_get_rate(priv->clk) > 1000000000)
- return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Failed to lock clock\n");
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Clock freq too high (%lu)\n",
+ clk_get_rate(priv->clk));
chip->ops = &stm32pwm_ops;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.9/pwm-stm32-fix-error-message-to-not-describe-the-previous-error-path.patch
queue-6.9/pwm-stm32-fix-calculation-of-prescaler.patch
queue-6.9/pwm-stm32-refuse-too-small-period-requests.patch
