This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
bpf: Add missed var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val()
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bpf-add-missed-var_off-setting-in-set_sext32_default.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit d9c63b7b8c8d238d926ebd3cae858445c12a4aaf
Author: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat Jun 15 10:46:26 2024 -0700
bpf: Add missed var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val()
[ Upstream commit 380d5f89a4815ff88461a45de2fb6f28533df708 ]
Zac reported a verification failure and Alexei reproduced the issue
with a simple reproducer ([1]). The verification failure is due to missed
setting for var_off.
The following is the reproducer in [1]:
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387) ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0
1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
2: (36) if w7 >= 0x2533823b goto pc-3
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 2 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387)
2: R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
3: (b4) w0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
4: (95) exit
Note that after insn 1, the var_off for R7 is (0x0; 0x7f). This is not correct
since upper 24 bits of w7 could be 0 or 1. So correct var_off should be
(0x0; 0xffffffff). Missing var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val() caused later
incorrect analysis in zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) and reg_bounds_sync(dst_reg).
To fix the issue, set var_off correctly in set_sext32_default_val(). The correct
reg state after insn 1 becomes:
1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
R7_w=scalar(smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=-128,smax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
and at insn 2, the verifier correctly determines either branch is possible.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLPU0Shz7dWV4bn2BgtGdxN3uFHPeobGBA72tpg5Xoykw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Fixes: 8100928c8814 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615174626.3994813-1-yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ec0464c075bb4..291bda5ef5526 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6159,6 +6159,7 @@ static void set_sext32_default_val(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
}
reg->u32_min_value = 0;
reg->u32_max_value = U32_MAX;
+ reg->var_off = tnum_subreg(tnum_unknown);
}
static void coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
