Patch "udf: udftime: prevent overflow in udf_disk_stamp_to_time()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    udf: udftime: prevent overflow in udf_disk_stamp_to_time()

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     udf-udftime-prevent-overflow-in-udf_disk_stamp_to_ti.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 2cb5a53df148e02292bea302fdb294ef2abd7cc1
Author: Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@xxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Mar 27 16:27:55 2024 +0300

    udf: udftime: prevent overflow in udf_disk_stamp_to_time()
    
    [ Upstream commit 3b84adf460381169c085e4bc09e7b57e9e16db0a ]
    
    An overflow can occur in a situation where src.centiseconds
    takes the value of 255. This situation is unlikely, but there
    is no validation check anywere in the code.
    
    Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.
    
    Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Roman Smirnov <r.smirnov@xxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
    Message-Id: <20240327132755.13945-1-r.smirnov@xxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/udf/udftime.c b/fs/udf/udftime.c
index fce4ad976c8c2..26169b1f482c3 100644
--- a/fs/udf/udftime.c
+++ b/fs/udf/udftime.c
@@ -60,13 +60,18 @@ udf_disk_stamp_to_time(struct timespec64 *dest, struct timestamp src)
 	dest->tv_sec = mktime64(year, src.month, src.day, src.hour, src.minute,
 			src.second);
 	dest->tv_sec -= offset * 60;
-	dest->tv_nsec = 1000 * (src.centiseconds * 10000 +
-			src.hundredsOfMicroseconds * 100 + src.microseconds);
+
 	/*
 	 * Sanitize nanosecond field since reportedly some filesystems are
 	 * recorded with bogus sub-second values.
 	 */
-	dest->tv_nsec %= NSEC_PER_SEC;
+	if (src.centiseconds < 100 && src.hundredsOfMicroseconds < 100 &&
+	    src.microseconds < 100) {
+		dest->tv_nsec = 1000 * (src.centiseconds * 10000 +
+			src.hundredsOfMicroseconds * 100 + src.microseconds);
+	} else {
+		dest->tv_nsec = 0;
+	}
 }
 
 void




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux