This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
nfsd: reshuffle some code
to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
nfsd-reshuffle-some-code.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit a513099c2bcbb54b88fdf466a24c11d32fb6a6ff
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Apr 16 14:00:17 2021 -0400
nfsd: reshuffle some code
[ Upstream commit ebd9d2c2f5a7ebaaed2d7bb4dee148755f46033d ]
No change in behavior, I'm just moving some code around to avoid forward
references in a following patch.
(To do someday: figure out how to split up nfs4state.c. It's big and
disorganized.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 89d5669ce1463..9c8dacf0f2b86 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -354,6 +354,124 @@ static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_ops = {
.release = nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_release,
};
+/*
+ * We store the NONE, READ, WRITE, and BOTH bits separately in the
+ * st_{access,deny}_bmap field of the stateid, in order to track not
+ * only what share bits are currently in force, but also what
+ * combinations of share bits previous opens have used. This allows us
+ * to enforce the recommendation of rfc 3530 14.2.19 that the server
+ * return an error if the client attempt to downgrade to a combination
+ * of share bits not explicable by closing some of its previous opens.
+ *
+ * XXX: This enforcement is actually incomplete, since we don't keep
+ * track of access/deny bit combinations; so, e.g., we allow:
+ *
+ * OPEN allow read, deny write
+ * OPEN allow both, deny none
+ * DOWNGRADE allow read, deny none
+ *
+ * which we should reject.
+ */
+static unsigned int
+bmap_to_share_mode(unsigned long bmap)
+{
+ int i;
+ unsigned int access = 0;
+
+ for (i = 1; i < 4; i++) {
+ if (test_bit(i, &bmap))
+ access |= i;
+ }
+ return access;
+}
+
+/* set share access for a given stateid */
+static inline void
+set_access(u32 access, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
+{
+ unsigned char mask = 1 << access;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(access > NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH);
+ stp->st_access_bmap |= mask;
+}
+
+/* clear share access for a given stateid */
+static inline void
+clear_access(u32 access, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
+{
+ unsigned char mask = 1 << access;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(access > NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH);
+ stp->st_access_bmap &= ~mask;
+}
+
+/* test whether a given stateid has access */
+static inline bool
+test_access(u32 access, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
+{
+ unsigned char mask = 1 << access;
+
+ return (bool)(stp->st_access_bmap & mask);
+}
+
+/* set share deny for a given stateid */
+static inline void
+set_deny(u32 deny, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
+{
+ unsigned char mask = 1 << deny;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(deny > NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
+ stp->st_deny_bmap |= mask;
+}
+
+/* clear share deny for a given stateid */
+static inline void
+clear_deny(u32 deny, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
+{
+ unsigned char mask = 1 << deny;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(deny > NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
+ stp->st_deny_bmap &= ~mask;
+}
+
+/* test whether a given stateid is denying specific access */
+static inline bool
+test_deny(u32 deny, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
+{
+ unsigned char mask = 1 << deny;
+
+ return (bool)(stp->st_deny_bmap & mask);
+}
+
+static int nfs4_access_to_omode(u32 access)
+{
+ switch (access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH) {
+ case NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ:
+ return O_RDONLY;
+ case NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE:
+ return O_WRONLY;
+ case NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH:
+ return O_RDWR;
+ }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return O_RDONLY;
+}
+
+static inline int
+access_permit_read(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
+{
+ return test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ, stp) ||
+ test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH, stp) ||
+ test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, stp);
+}
+
+static inline int
+access_permit_write(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
+{
+ return test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, stp) ||
+ test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH, stp);
+}
+
static inline struct nfs4_stateowner *
nfs4_get_stateowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
{
@@ -1167,108 +1285,6 @@ static unsigned int clientstr_hashval(struct xdr_netobj name)
return opaque_hashval(name.data, 8) & CLIENT_HASH_MASK;
}
-/*
- * We store the NONE, READ, WRITE, and BOTH bits separately in the
- * st_{access,deny}_bmap field of the stateid, in order to track not
- * only what share bits are currently in force, but also what
- * combinations of share bits previous opens have used. This allows us
- * to enforce the recommendation of rfc 3530 14.2.19 that the server
- * return an error if the client attempt to downgrade to a combination
- * of share bits not explicable by closing some of its previous opens.
- *
- * XXX: This enforcement is actually incomplete, since we don't keep
- * track of access/deny bit combinations; so, e.g., we allow:
- *
- * OPEN allow read, deny write
- * OPEN allow both, deny none
- * DOWNGRADE allow read, deny none
- *
- * which we should reject.
- */
-static unsigned int
-bmap_to_share_mode(unsigned long bmap) {
- int i;
- unsigned int access = 0;
-
- for (i = 1; i < 4; i++) {
- if (test_bit(i, &bmap))
- access |= i;
- }
- return access;
-}
-
-/* set share access for a given stateid */
-static inline void
-set_access(u32 access, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
-{
- unsigned char mask = 1 << access;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(access > NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH);
- stp->st_access_bmap |= mask;
-}
-
-/* clear share access for a given stateid */
-static inline void
-clear_access(u32 access, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
-{
- unsigned char mask = 1 << access;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(access > NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH);
- stp->st_access_bmap &= ~mask;
-}
-
-/* test whether a given stateid has access */
-static inline bool
-test_access(u32 access, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
-{
- unsigned char mask = 1 << access;
-
- return (bool)(stp->st_access_bmap & mask);
-}
-
-/* set share deny for a given stateid */
-static inline void
-set_deny(u32 deny, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
-{
- unsigned char mask = 1 << deny;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(deny > NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
- stp->st_deny_bmap |= mask;
-}
-
-/* clear share deny for a given stateid */
-static inline void
-clear_deny(u32 deny, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
-{
- unsigned char mask = 1 << deny;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(deny > NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
- stp->st_deny_bmap &= ~mask;
-}
-
-/* test whether a given stateid is denying specific access */
-static inline bool
-test_deny(u32 deny, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
-{
- unsigned char mask = 1 << deny;
-
- return (bool)(stp->st_deny_bmap & mask);
-}
-
-static int nfs4_access_to_omode(u32 access)
-{
- switch (access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH) {
- case NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ:
- return O_RDONLY;
- case NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE:
- return O_WRONLY;
- case NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH:
- return O_RDWR;
- }
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- return O_RDONLY;
-}
-
/*
* A stateid that had a deny mode associated with it is being released
* or downgraded. Recalculate the deny mode on the file.
@@ -5565,21 +5581,6 @@ static inline __be32 nfs4_check_fh(struct svc_fh *fhp, struct nfs4_stid *stp)
return nfs_ok;
}
-static inline int
-access_permit_read(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
-{
- return test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ, stp) ||
- test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH, stp) ||
- test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, stp);
-}
-
-static inline int
-access_permit_write(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
-{
- return test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, stp) ||
- test_access(NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH, stp);
-}
-
static
__be32 nfs4_check_openmode(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp, int flags)
{
