Patch "af_unix: Run GC on only one CPU." has been added to the 6.6-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    af_unix: Run GC on only one CPU.

to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     af_unix-run-gc-on-only-one-cpu.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 98ec559b1b6f1e877ae9fa39c646ecfcdc6d6342
Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Jan 23 09:08:55 2024 -0800

    af_unix: Run GC on only one CPU.
    
    [ Upstream commit 8b90a9f819dc2a06baae4ec1a64d875e53b824ec ]
    
    If more than 16000 inflight AF_UNIX sockets exist and the garbage
    collector is not running, unix_(dgram|stream)_sendmsg() call unix_gc().
    Also, they wait for unix_gc() to complete.
    
    In unix_gc(), all inflight AF_UNIX sockets are traversed at least once,
    and more if they are the GC candidate.  Thus, sendmsg() significantly
    slows down with too many inflight AF_UNIX sockets.
    
    There is a small window to invoke multiple unix_gc() instances, which
    will then be blocked by the same spinlock except for one.
    
    Let's convert unix_gc() to use struct work so that it will not consume
    CPUs unnecessarily.
    
    Note WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, true) is moved before running GC.
    If we leave the WRITE_ONCE() as is and use the following test to
    call flush_work(), a process might not call it.
    
        CPU 0                                     CPU 1
        ---                                       ---
                                                  start work and call __unix_gc()
        if (work_pending(&unix_gc_work) ||        <-- false
            READ_ONCE(gc_in_progress))            <-- false
                flush_work();                     <-- missed!
                                                  WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, true)
    
    Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240123170856.41348-5-kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Stable-dep-of: 1b536948e805 ("af_unix: Annotate data-race of sk->sk_state in unix_accept().")
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index 38639766b9e7c..a2a8543613a52 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@
 /* Internal data structures and random procedures: */
 
 static LIST_HEAD(gc_candidates);
-static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(unix_gc_wait);
 
 static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
 			  struct sk_buff_head *hitlist)
@@ -182,23 +181,8 @@ static void inc_inflight_move_tail(struct unix_sock *u)
 }
 
 static bool gc_in_progress;
-#define UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC 16000
-
-void wait_for_unix_gc(void)
-{
-	/* If number of inflight sockets is insane,
-	 * force a garbage collect right now.
-	 * Paired with the WRITE_ONCE() in unix_inflight(),
-	 * unix_notinflight() and gc_in_progress().
-	 */
-	if (READ_ONCE(unix_tot_inflight) > UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC &&
-	    !READ_ONCE(gc_in_progress))
-		unix_gc();
-	wait_event(unix_gc_wait, !READ_ONCE(gc_in_progress));
-}
 
-/* The external entry point: unix_gc() */
-void unix_gc(void)
+static void __unix_gc(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *next_skb, *skb;
 	struct unix_sock *u;
@@ -209,13 +193,6 @@ void unix_gc(void)
 
 	spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
 
-	/* Avoid a recursive GC. */
-	if (gc_in_progress)
-		goto out;
-
-	/* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc(). */
-	WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, true);
-
 	/* First, select candidates for garbage collection.  Only
 	 * in-flight sockets are considered, and from those only ones
 	 * which don't have any external reference.
@@ -346,8 +323,31 @@ void unix_gc(void)
 	/* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc(). */
 	WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, false);
 
-	wake_up(&unix_gc_wait);
-
- out:
 	spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
 }
+
+static DECLARE_WORK(unix_gc_work, __unix_gc);
+
+void unix_gc(void)
+{
+	WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, true);
+	queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &unix_gc_work);
+}
+
+#define UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC 16000
+
+void wait_for_unix_gc(void)
+{
+	/* If number of inflight sockets is insane,
+	 * force a garbage collect right now.
+	 *
+	 * Paired with the WRITE_ONCE() in unix_inflight(),
+	 * unix_notinflight(), and __unix_gc().
+	 */
+	if (READ_ONCE(unix_tot_inflight) > UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC &&
+	    !READ_ONCE(gc_in_progress))
+		unix_gc();
+
+	if (READ_ONCE(gc_in_progress))
+		flush_work(&unix_gc_work);
+}




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux