On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 4:45 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024, at 15:04, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From 8f7f115596d3dccedc06f5813e0269734f5cc534 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:30:38 +0200
> > Subject: Revert "drm: Make drivers depends on DRM_DW_HDMI"
> >
> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit 8f7f115596d3dccedc06f5813e0269734f5cc534 upstream.
> >
> > This reverts commit c0e0f139354c01e0213204e4a96e7076e5a3e396, as helper
>
> As far as I can tell, the original commit never made it into
> stable/linux-6.9.y, so maybe remove c0e0f139354c ("drm: Make
> drivers depends on DRM_DW_HDMI") instead of reverting it?
TBH, I do not understand why this commit was backported: it was reverted
in the same pull request that introduced the bad commit, and thus both
the bad commit and the revert ended up upstream together.
Looks like a good opportunity to improve the backporting scripts...
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
