This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT to the 6.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: perf-dwarf-aux-fix-build-with-have_dwarf_cfi_support.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 46b039c69c350ecd257ebb1c1441acb4ca23f02a Author: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed May 8 15:14:57 2024 +0100 perf dwarf-aux: Fix build with HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT [ Upstream commit c9d492378faec5c1fb8ea1534c620f7320bbb23a ] check_allowed_ops() is used from both HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT and HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT sections, so move it into the right place so that it's available when either are defined. This shows up when doing a static cross compile for arm64: $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS="-static" \ EXTRA_PERFLIBS="-lexpat" util/dwarf-aux.c:1723:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_allowed_ops' Fixes: 55442cc2f22d0727 ("perf dwarf-aux: Check allowed DWARF Ops") Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240508141458.439017-1-james.clark@xxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c index ff1874ae0832e..f93e57e2fc42e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c @@ -1168,6 +1168,34 @@ static int offset_from_dwarf_op(Dwarf_Op *op) } return -1; } + +static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops) +{ + /* The first op is checked separately */ + ops++; + nops--; + + /* + * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given + * register and offset exactly. Thus it rejects any complex expressions + * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the + * location. + */ + while (nops) { + switch (ops->atom) { + case DW_OP_stack_value: + case DW_OP_deref_size: + case DW_OP_deref: + case DW_OP_piece: + break; + default: + return false; + } + ops++; + nops--; + } + return true; +} #endif /* HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT || HAVE_DWARF_CFI_SUPPORT */ #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT @@ -1345,34 +1373,6 @@ static bool match_var_offset(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, struct find_var_data *data, return true; } -static bool check_allowed_ops(Dwarf_Op *ops, size_t nops) -{ - /* The first op is checked separately */ - ops++; - nops--; - - /* - * It needs to make sure if the location expression matches to the given - * register and offset exactly. Thus it rejects any complex expressions - * and only allows a few of selected operators that doesn't change the - * location. - */ - while (nops) { - switch (ops->atom) { - case DW_OP_stack_value: - case DW_OP_deref_size: - case DW_OP_deref: - case DW_OP_piece: - break; - default: - return false; - } - ops++; - nops--; - } - return true; -} - /* Only checks direct child DIEs in the given scope. */ static int __die_find_var_reg_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *arg) {