Patch "pwm: sti: Prepare removing pwm_chip from driver data" has been added to the 5.15-stable tree

[Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    pwm: sti: Prepare removing pwm_chip from driver data

to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     pwm-sti-prepare-removing-pwm_chip-from-driver-data.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 15ee3f214c337a273828ea2a5edba8b22eab3f52
Author: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Feb 14 10:32:38 2024 +0100

    pwm: sti: Prepare removing pwm_chip from driver data
    
    [ Upstream commit 54272761ce7c475fa30a31b59b0cb89f7652b39e ]
    
    This prepares the driver for further changes that will drop struct
    pwm_chip chip from struct sti_pwm_chip. Use the pwm_chip as driver data
    instead of the sti_pwm_chip to get access to the pwm_chip in
    sti_pwm_remove() without using pc->chip.
    
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/56d53372aacff6871df4d6c6779c9dac94592696.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Stable-dep-of: 5bb0b194aeee ("pwm: sti: Simplify probe function using devm functions")
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
index c782378dff5e5..8f7aff51787be 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
@@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct sti_pwm_compat_data *cdata;
+	struct pwm_chip *chip;
 	struct sti_pwm_chip *pc;
 	unsigned int i;
 	int irq, ret;
@@ -578,6 +579,7 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pc)
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	chip = &pc->chip;
 
 	cdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cdata), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!cdata)
@@ -654,9 +656,9 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	pc->chip.dev = dev;
-	pc->chip.ops = &sti_pwm_ops;
-	pc->chip.npwm = max(cdata->pwm_num_devs, cdata->cpt_num_devs);
+	chip->dev = dev;
+	chip->ops = &sti_pwm_ops;
+	chip->npwm = max(cdata->pwm_num_devs, cdata->cpt_num_devs);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < cdata->cpt_num_devs; i++) {
 		struct sti_cpt_ddata *ddata = &cdata->ddata[i];
@@ -665,23 +667,24 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		mutex_init(&ddata->lock);
 	}
 
-	ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
+	ret = pwmchip_add(chip);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		clk_unprepare(pc->pwm_clk);
 		clk_unprepare(pc->cpt_clk);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void sti_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct sti_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct pwm_chip *chip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct sti_pwm_chip *pc = to_sti_pwmchip(chip);
 
-	pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
+	pwmchip_remove(chip);
 
 	clk_unprepare(pc->pwm_clk);
 	clk_unprepare(pc->cpt_clk);