This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: cppc_cpufreq-fix-possible-null-pointer-dereference.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit f98ad68133c62c6cfb48b6eb904a62698f69ba73 Author: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Apr 8 12:35:36 2024 +0300 cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference [ Upstream commit cf7de25878a1f4508c69dc9f6819c21ba177dbfe ] cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() and hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() can be called from different places with various parameters. So cpufreq_cpu_get() can return null as 'policy' in some circumstances. Fix this bug by adding null return check. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Fixes: a28b2bfc099c ("cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list") Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index 022e3555407c8..8791a88c7741c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -841,10 +841,15 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) { struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0 = {0}, fb_ctrs_t1 = {0}; struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); - struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data; + struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data; u64 delivered_perf; int ret; + if (!policy) + return -ENODEV; + + cpu_data = policy->driver_data; + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs_t0); @@ -924,10 +929,15 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = { static unsigned int hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); - struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data; + struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data; u64 desired_perf; int ret; + if (!policy) + return -ENODEV; + + cpu_data = policy->driver_data; + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); ret = cppc_get_desired_perf(cpu, &desired_perf);