Patch "epoll: be better about file lifetimes" has been added to the 6.8-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    epoll: be better about file lifetimes

to the 6.8-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     epoll-be-better-about-file-lifetimes.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.8 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 0385671ecc332810d1bd350ed1a28a1c3ff1b12a
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri May 3 13:36:09 2024 -0700

    epoll: be better about file lifetimes
    
    [ Upstream commit 4efaa5acf0a1d2b5947f98abb3acf8bfd966422b ]
    
    epoll can call out to vfs_poll() with a file pointer that may race with
    the last 'fput()'. That would make f_count go down to zero, and while
    the ep->mtx locking means that the resulting file pointer tear-down will
    be blocked until the poll returns, it means that f_count is already
    dead, and any use of it won't actually get a reference to the file any
    more: it's dead regardless.
    
    Make sure we have a valid ref on the file pointer before we call down to
    vfs_poll() from the epoll routines.
    
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000002d631f0615918f1e@xxxxxxxxxx/
    Reported-by: syzbot+045b454ab35fd82a35fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 3534d36a14740..c5a9a483fb538 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -875,6 +875,34 @@ static __poll_t __ep_eventpoll_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait, int dep
 	return res;
 }
 
+/*
+ * The ffd.file pointer may be in the process of being torn down due to
+ * being closed, but we may not have finished eventpoll_release() yet.
+ *
+ * Normally, even with the atomic_long_inc_not_zero, the file may have
+ * been free'd and then gotten re-allocated to something else (since
+ * files are not RCU-delayed, they are SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU).
+ *
+ * But for epoll, users hold the ep->mtx mutex, and as such any file in
+ * the process of being free'd will block in eventpoll_release_file()
+ * and thus the underlying file allocation will not be free'd, and the
+ * file re-use cannot happen.
+ *
+ * For the same reason we can avoid a rcu_read_lock() around the
+ * operation - 'ffd.file' cannot go away even if the refcount has
+ * reached zero (but we must still not call out to ->poll() functions
+ * etc).
+ */
+static struct file *epi_fget(const struct epitem *epi)
+{
+	struct file *file;
+
+	file = epi->ffd.file;
+	if (!atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&file->f_count))
+		file = NULL;
+	return file;
+}
+
 /*
  * Differs from ep_eventpoll_poll() in that internal callers already have
  * the ep->mtx so we need to start from depth=1, such that mutex_lock_nested()
@@ -883,14 +911,22 @@ static __poll_t __ep_eventpoll_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait, int dep
 static __poll_t ep_item_poll(const struct epitem *epi, poll_table *pt,
 				 int depth)
 {
-	struct file *file = epi->ffd.file;
+	struct file *file = epi_fget(epi);
 	__poll_t res;
 
+	/*
+	 * We could return EPOLLERR | EPOLLHUP or something, but let's
+	 * treat this more as "file doesn't exist, poll didn't happen".
+	 */
+	if (!file)
+		return 0;
+
 	pt->_key = epi->event.events;
 	if (!is_file_epoll(file))
 		res = vfs_poll(file, pt);
 	else
 		res = __ep_eventpoll_poll(file, pt, depth);
+	fput(file);
 	return res & epi->event.events;
 }
 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux