This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
clk: sunxi-ng: common: Support minimum and maximum rate
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
clk-sunxi-ng-common-support-minimum-and-maximum-rate.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From b914ec33b391ec766545a41f0cfc0de3e0b388d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:21:11 +0100
Subject: clk: sunxi-ng: common: Support minimum and maximum rate
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit b914ec33b391ec766545a41f0cfc0de3e0b388d7 upstream.
The Allwinner SoC's typically have an upper and lower limit for their
clocks' rates. Up until now, support for that has been implemented
separately for each clock type.
Implement that functionality in the sunxi-ng's common part making use of
the CCF rate liming capabilities, so that it is available for all clock
types.
Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240310-pinephone-pll-fixes-v4-1-46fc80c83637@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_common.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_common.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_common.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_common.c
@@ -44,6 +44,16 @@ bool ccu_is_better_rate(struct ccu_commo
unsigned long current_rate,
unsigned long best_rate)
{
+ unsigned long min_rate, max_rate;
+
+ clk_hw_get_rate_range(&common->hw, &min_rate, &max_rate);
+
+ if (current_rate > max_rate)
+ return false;
+
+ if (current_rate < min_rate)
+ return false;
+
if (common->features & CCU_FEATURE_CLOSEST_RATE)
return abs(current_rate - target_rate) < abs(best_rate - target_rate);
@@ -122,6 +132,7 @@ static int sunxi_ccu_probe(struct sunxi_
for (i = 0; i < desc->hw_clks->num ; i++) {
struct clk_hw *hw = desc->hw_clks->hws[i];
+ struct ccu_common *common = hw_to_ccu_common(hw);
const char *name;
if (!hw)
@@ -136,6 +147,14 @@ static int sunxi_ccu_probe(struct sunxi_
pr_err("Couldn't register clock %d - %s\n", i, name);
goto err_clk_unreg;
}
+
+ if (common->max_rate)
+ clk_hw_set_rate_range(hw, common->min_rate,
+ common->max_rate);
+ else
+ WARN(common->min_rate,
+ "No max_rate, ignoring min_rate of clock %d - %s\n",
+ i, name);
}
ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_common.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_common.h
@@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ struct ccu_common {
u16 lock_reg;
u32 prediv;
+ unsigned long min_rate;
+ unsigned long max_rate;
+
unsigned long features;
spinlock_t *lock;
struct clk_hw hw;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.6/clk-sunxi-ng-common-support-minimum-and-maximum-rate.patch
queue-6.6/clk-sunxi-ng-a64-set-minimum-and-maximum-rate-for-pll-mipi.patch
