This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: nf_tables: reject table flag and netdev basechain updates
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-nf_tables-reject-table-flag-and-netdev-bas.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 4f6a31316eafb9f7b010e2d2188ce0775fa8962e
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Mar 21 01:27:59 2024 +0100
netfilter: nf_tables: reject table flag and netdev basechain updates
[ Upstream commit 1e1fb6f00f52812277963365d9bd835b9b0ea4e0 ]
netdev basechain updates are stored in the transaction object hook list.
When setting on the table dormant flag, it iterates over the existing
hooks in the basechain. Thus, skipping the hooks that are being
added/deleted in this transaction, which leaves hook registration in
inconsistent state.
Reject table flag updates in combination with netdev basechain updates
in the same batch:
- Update table flags and add/delete basechain: Check from basechain update
path if there are pending flag updates for this table.
- add/delete basechain and update table flags: Iterate over the transaction
list to search for basechain updates from the table update path.
In both cases, the batch is rejected. Based on suggestion from Florian Westphal.
Fixes: b9703ed44ffb ("netfilter: nf_tables: support for adding new devices to an existing netdev chain")
Fixes: 7d937b107108f ("netfilter: nf_tables: support for deleting devices in an existing netdev chain")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 0653f1e5e8929..6e4e22a10a826 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -1200,6 +1200,25 @@ static void nf_tables_table_disable(struct net *net, struct nft_table *table)
#define __NFT_TABLE_F_UPDATE (__NFT_TABLE_F_WAS_DORMANT | \
__NFT_TABLE_F_WAS_AWAKEN)
+static bool nft_table_pending_update(const struct nft_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ struct nftables_pernet *nft_net = nft_pernet(ctx->net);
+ struct nft_trans *trans;
+
+ if (ctx->table->flags & __NFT_TABLE_F_UPDATE)
+ return true;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(trans, &nft_net->commit_list, list) {
+ if ((trans->msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN ||
+ trans->msg_type == NFT_MSG_DELCHAIN) &&
+ trans->ctx.table == ctx->table &&
+ nft_trans_chain_update(trans))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static int nf_tables_updtable(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
{
struct nft_trans *trans;
@@ -1223,7 +1242,7 @@ static int nf_tables_updtable(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
/* No dormant off/on/off/on games in single transaction */
- if (ctx->table->flags & __NFT_TABLE_F_UPDATE)
+ if (nft_table_pending_update(ctx))
return -EINVAL;
trans = nft_trans_alloc(ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWTABLE,
@@ -2621,6 +2640,13 @@ static int nf_tables_updchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 genmask, u8 policy,
}
}
+ if (table->flags & __NFT_TABLE_F_UPDATE &&
+ !list_empty(&hook.list)) {
+ NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, attr);
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto err_hooks;
+ }
+
if (!(table->flags & NFT_TABLE_F_DORMANT) &&
nft_is_base_chain(chain) &&
!list_empty(&hook.list)) {
@@ -2850,6 +2876,9 @@ static int nft_delchain_hook(struct nft_ctx *ctx,
struct nft_trans *trans;
int err;
+ if (ctx->table->flags & __NFT_TABLE_F_UPDATE)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
err = nft_chain_parse_hook(ctx->net, basechain, nla, &chain_hook,
ctx->family, chain->flags, extack);
if (err < 0)
