This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
swiotlb: Fix alignment checks when both allocation and DMA masks are present
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
swiotlb-fix-alignment-checks-when-both-allocation-an.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit b86ab7742b5a07494c16e9b5fd1f5a56d2365b4b
Author: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Mar 8 15:28:27 2024 +0000
swiotlb: Fix alignment checks when both allocation and DMA masks are present
[ Upstream commit 51b30ecb73b481d5fac6ccf2ecb4a309c9ee3310 ]
Nicolin reports that swiotlb buffer allocations fail for an NVME device
behind an IOMMU using 64KiB pages. This is because we end up with a
minimum allocation alignment of 64KiB (for the IOMMU to map the buffer
safely) but a minimum DMA alignment mask corresponding to a 4KiB NVME
page (i.e. preserving the 4KiB page offset from the original allocation).
If the original address is not 4KiB-aligned, the allocation will fail
because swiotlb_search_pool_area() erroneously compares these unmasked
bits with the 64KiB-aligned candidate allocation.
Tweak swiotlb_search_pool_area() so that the DMA alignment mask is
reduced based on the required alignment of the allocation.
Fixes: 82612d66d51d ("iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use bounce buffers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1707851466.git.nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index ded5a1f9e8f82..675ae318f74f8 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -981,8 +981,7 @@ static int swiotlb_area_find_slots(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool,
dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr =
phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, pool->start) & boundary_mask;
unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
- unsigned int iotlb_align_mask =
- dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
+ unsigned int iotlb_align_mask = dma_get_min_align_mask(dev);
unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride;
unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
unsigned int index, slots_checked, count = 0, i;
@@ -993,6 +992,14 @@ static int swiotlb_area_find_slots(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool,
BUG_ON(!nslots);
BUG_ON(area_index >= pool->nareas);
+ /*
+ * Ensure that the allocation is at least slot-aligned and update
+ * 'iotlb_align_mask' to ignore bits that will be preserved when
+ * offsetting into the allocation.
+ */
+ alloc_align_mask |= (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
+ iotlb_align_mask &= ~alloc_align_mask;
+
/*
* For mappings with an alignment requirement don't bother looping to
* unaligned slots once we found an aligned one.
