This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
wireguard: receive: annotate data-race around receiving_counter.counter
to the 6.7-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
wireguard-receive-annotate-data-race-around-receivin.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.7 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 98db0a37e49970bfecc78319d6af43f871ef9996
Author: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Mar 14 16:49:06 2024 -0600
wireguard: receive: annotate data-race around receiving_counter.counter
[ Upstream commit bba045dc4d996d03dce6fe45726e78a1a1f6d4c3 ]
Syzkaller with KCSAN identified a data-race issue when accessing
keypair->receiving_counter.counter. Use READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()
annotations to mark the data race as intentional.
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in wg_packet_decrypt_worker / wg_packet_rx_poll
write to 0xffff888107765888 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 0:
counter_validate drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c:321 [inline]
wg_packet_rx_poll+0x3ac/0xf00 drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c:461
__napi_poll+0x60/0x3b0 net/core/dev.c:6536
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6605 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x32b/0x750 net/core/dev.c:6738
__do_softirq+0xc4/0x279 kernel/softirq.c:553
do_softirq+0x5e/0x90 kernel/softirq.c:454
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x64/0x70 kernel/softirq.c:381
__raw_spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:167 [inline]
_raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x36/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:210
spin_unlock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:396 [inline]
ptr_ring_consume_bh include/linux/ptr_ring.h:367 [inline]
wg_packet_decrypt_worker+0x6c5/0x700 drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c:499
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2633 [inline]
...
read to 0xffff888107765888 of 8 bytes by task 3196 on cpu 1:
decrypt_packet drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c:252 [inline]
wg_packet_decrypt_worker+0x220/0x700 drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c:501
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2633 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0x5b8/0xa30 kernel/workqueue.c:2706
worker_thread+0x525/0x730 kernel/workqueue.c:2787
...
Fixes: a9e90d9931f3 ("wireguard: noise: separate receive counter from send counter")
Reported-by: syzbot+d1de830e4ecdaac83d89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
index a176653c88616..db01ec03bda00 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static bool decrypt_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct noise_keypair *keypair)
if (unlikely(!READ_ONCE(keypair->receiving.is_valid) ||
wg_birthdate_has_expired(keypair->receiving.birthdate, REJECT_AFTER_TIME) ||
- keypair->receiving_counter.counter >= REJECT_AFTER_MESSAGES)) {
+ READ_ONCE(keypair->receiving_counter.counter) >= REJECT_AFTER_MESSAGES)) {
WRITE_ONCE(keypair->receiving.is_valid, false);
return false;
}
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static bool counter_validate(struct noise_replay_counter *counter, u64 their_cou
for (i = 1; i <= top; ++i)
counter->backtrack[(i + index_current) &
((COUNTER_BITS_TOTAL / BITS_PER_LONG) - 1)] = 0;
- counter->counter = their_counter;
+ WRITE_ONCE(counter->counter, their_counter);
}
index &= (COUNTER_BITS_TOTAL / BITS_PER_LONG) - 1;
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ int wg_packet_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: Packet has invalid nonce %llu (max %llu)\n",
peer->device->dev->name,
PACKET_CB(skb)->nonce,
- keypair->receiving_counter.counter);
+ READ_ONCE(keypair->receiving_counter.counter));
goto next;
}
