Patch "workqueue: Don't call cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    workqueue: Don't call cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()

to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     workqueue-don-t-call-cpumask_test_cpu-with-1-cpu-in-.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit e7538d7f19aafa6680f69cfe66b8dbc9990d853f
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Jan 30 18:55:55 2024 -1000

    workqueue: Don't call cpumask_test_cpu() with -1 CPU in wq_update_node_max_active()
    
    [ Upstream commit 15930da42f8981dc42c19038042947b475b19f47 ]
    
    For wq_update_node_max_active(), @off_cpu of -1 indicates that no CPU is
    going down. The function was incorrectly calling cpumask_test_cpu() with -1
    CPU leading to oopses like the following on some archs:
    
      Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff0002100296e0
      ..
      pc : wq_update_node_max_active+0x50/0x1fc
      lr : wq_update_node_max_active+0x1f0/0x1fc
      ...
      Call trace:
        wq_update_node_max_active+0x50/0x1fc
        apply_wqattrs_commit+0xf0/0x114
        apply_workqueue_attrs_locked+0x58/0xa0
        alloc_workqueue+0x5ac/0x774
        workqueue_init_early+0x460/0x540
        start_kernel+0x258/0x684
        __primary_switched+0xb8/0xc0
      Code: 9100a273 35000d01 53067f00 d0016dc1 (f8607a60)
      ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
      Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
      ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]---
    
    Fix it.
    
    Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/91eacde0-df99-4d5c-a980-91046f66e612@xxxxxxxxxxx
    Fixes: 5797b1c18919 ("workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues")
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b2975e44dffa9..7d231bbd16593 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ static void wq_update_node_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int off_cpu)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
 
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(off_cpu, effective))
+	if (off_cpu >= 0 && !cpumask_test_cpu(off_cpu, effective))
 		off_cpu = -1;
 
 	total_cpus = cpumask_weight_and(effective, cpu_online_mask);




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux