Patch "md/raid1: fix choose next idle in read_balance()" has been added to the 6.8-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    md/raid1: fix choose next idle in read_balance()

to the 6.8-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     md-raid1-fix-choose-next-idle-in-read_balance.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.8 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 6d693609b7141c49be796c87d2f0269df52e10c0
Author: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Feb 29 17:57:07 2024 +0800

    md/raid1: fix choose next idle in read_balance()
    
    [ Upstream commit 257ac239ffcfd097a9a0732bf5095fb00164f334 ]
    
    Commit 12cee5a8a29e ("md/raid1: prevent merging too large request") add
    the case choose next idle in read_balance():
    
    read_balance:
     for_each_rdev
      if(next_seq_sect == this_sector || dist == 0)
      -> sequential reads
       best_disk = disk;
       if (...)
        choose_next_idle = 1
        continue;
    
     for_each_rdev
     -> iterate next rdev
      if (pending == 0)
       best_disk = disk;
       -> choose the next idle disk
       break;
    
      if (choose_next_idle)
       -> keep using this rdev if there are no other idle disk
       contine
    
    However, commit 2e52d449bcec ("md/raid1: add failfast handling for reads.")
    remove the code:
    
    -               /* If device is idle, use it */
    -               if (pending == 0) {
    -                       best_disk = disk;
    -                       break;
    -               }
    
    Hence choose next idle will never work now, fix this problem by
    following:
    
    1) don't set best_disk in this case, read_balance() will choose the best
       disk after iterating all the disks;
    2) add 'pending' so that other idle disk will be chosen;
    3) add a new local variable 'sequential_disk' to record the disk, and if
       there is no other idle disk, 'sequential_disk' will be chosen;
    
    Fixes: 2e52d449bcec ("md/raid1: add failfast handling for reads.")
    Co-developed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229095714.926789-5-yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
index 456d745eb93b3..82c9bb404ccca 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -601,13 +601,12 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
 	const sector_t this_sector = r1_bio->sector;
 	int sectors;
 	int best_good_sectors;
-	int best_disk, best_dist_disk, best_pending_disk;
+	int best_disk, best_dist_disk, best_pending_disk, sequential_disk;
 	int disk;
 	sector_t best_dist;
 	unsigned int min_pending;
 	struct md_rdev *rdev;
 	int choose_first;
-	int choose_next_idle;
 
 	/*
 	 * Check if we can balance. We can balance on the whole
@@ -618,11 +617,11 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
 	sectors = r1_bio->sectors;
 	best_disk = -1;
 	best_dist_disk = -1;
+	sequential_disk = -1;
 	best_dist = MaxSector;
 	best_pending_disk = -1;
 	min_pending = UINT_MAX;
 	best_good_sectors = 0;
-	choose_next_idle = 0;
 	clear_bit(R1BIO_FailFast, &r1_bio->state);
 
 	if ((conf->mddev->recovery_cp < this_sector + sectors) ||
@@ -715,7 +714,6 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
 			int opt_iosize = bdev_io_opt(rdev->bdev) >> 9;
 			struct raid1_info *mirror = &conf->mirrors[disk];
 
-			best_disk = disk;
 			/*
 			 * If buffered sequential IO size exceeds optimal
 			 * iosize, check if there is idle disk. If yes, choose
@@ -734,15 +732,22 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
 			    mirror->next_seq_sect > opt_iosize &&
 			    mirror->next_seq_sect - opt_iosize >=
 			    mirror->seq_start) {
-				choose_next_idle = 1;
-				continue;
+				/*
+				 * Add 'pending' to avoid choosing this disk if
+				 * there is other idle disk.
+				 */
+				pending++;
+				/*
+				 * If there is no other idle disk, this disk
+				 * will be chosen.
+				 */
+				sequential_disk = disk;
+			} else {
+				best_disk = disk;
+				break;
 			}
-			break;
 		}
 
-		if (choose_next_idle)
-			continue;
-
 		if (min_pending > pending) {
 			min_pending = pending;
 			best_pending_disk = disk;
@@ -754,6 +759,13 @@ static int read_balance(struct r1conf *conf, struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *max_sect
 		}
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * sequential IO size exceeds optimal iosize, however, there is no other
+	 * idle disk, so choose the sequential disk.
+	 */
+	if (best_disk == -1 && min_pending != 0)
+		best_disk = sequential_disk;
+
 	/*
 	 * If all disks are rotational, choose the closest disk. If any disk is
 	 * non-rotational, choose the disk with less pending request even the




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux