This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled x86/numa: Fix the sort compare func used in numa_fill_memblks() to the 6.7-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: x86-numa-fix-the-sort-compare-func-used-in-numa_fill.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.7 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit 0b250eb267f5f24bac76f7120046ca0fc56f6442 Author: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Jan 12 12:09:51 2024 -0800 x86/numa: Fix the sort compare func used in numa_fill_memblks() [ Upstream commit b626070ffc14acca5b87a2aa5f581db98617584c ] The compare function used to sort memblks into starting address order fails when the result of its u64 address subtraction gets truncated to an int upon return. The impact of the bad sort is that memblks will be filled out incorrectly. Depending on the set of memblks, a user may see no errors at all but still have a bad fill, or see messages reporting a node overlap that leads to numa init failure: [] node 0 [mem: ] overlaps with node 1 [mem: ] [] No NUMA configuration found Replace with a comparison that can only result in: 1, 0, -1. Fixes: 8f012db27c95 ("x86/numa: Introduce numa_fill_memblks()") Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/99dcb3ae87e04995e9f293f6158dc8fa0749a487.1705085543.git.alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index efc5f1be8d3af..9d63cfff1fd41 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ static int __init cmp_memblk(const void *a, const void *b) const struct numa_memblk *ma = *(const struct numa_memblk **)a; const struct numa_memblk *mb = *(const struct numa_memblk **)b; - return ma->start - mb->start; + return (ma->start > mb->start) - (ma->start < mb->start); } static struct numa_memblk *numa_memblk_list[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;