Patch "nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     nilfs2-fix-potential-bug-in-end_buffer_async_write.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 5bc09b397cbf1221f8a8aacb1152650c9195b02b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 01:16:45 +0900
Subject: nilfs2: fix potential bug in end_buffer_async_write

From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 5bc09b397cbf1221f8a8aacb1152650c9195b02b upstream.

According to a syzbot report, end_buffer_async_write(), which handles the
completion of block device writes, may detect abnormal condition of the
buffer async_write flag and cause a BUG_ON failure when using nilfs2.

Nilfs2 itself does not use end_buffer_async_write().  But, the async_write
flag is now used as a marker by commit 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue
with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks") as
a means of resolving double list insertion of dirty blocks in
nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers() and nilfs_lookup_node_buffers() and the
resulting crash.

This modification is safe as long as it is used for file data and b-tree
node blocks where the page caches are independent.  However, it was
irrelevant and redundant to also introduce async_write for segment summary
and super root blocks that share buffers with the backing device.  This
led to the possibility that the BUG_ON check in end_buffer_async_write
would fail as described above, if independent writebacks of the backing
device occurred in parallel.

The use of async_write for segment summary buffers has already been
removed in a previous change.

Fix this issue by removing the manipulation of the async_write flag for
the remaining super root block buffer.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240203161645.4992-1-konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 7f42ec394156 ("nilfs2: fix issue with race condition of competition between segments for dirty blocks")
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: syzbot+5c04210f7c7f897c1e7f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000019a97c05fd42f8c8@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nilfs2/segment.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -1707,7 +1707,6 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(
 
 		list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers,
 				    b_assoc_buffers) {
-			set_buffer_async_write(bh);
 			if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
 				if (bh->b_page != bd_page) {
 					lock_page(bd_page);
@@ -1718,6 +1717,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_prepare_write(
 				}
 				break;
 			}
+			set_buffer_async_write(bh);
 			if (bh->b_page != fs_page) {
 				nilfs_begin_page_io(fs_page);
 				fs_page = bh->b_page;
@@ -1803,7 +1803,6 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list
 
 		list_for_each_entry(bh, &segbuf->sb_payload_buffers,
 				    b_assoc_buffers) {
-			clear_buffer_async_write(bh);
 			if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
 				clear_buffer_uptodate(bh);
 				if (bh->b_page != bd_page) {
@@ -1812,6 +1811,7 @@ static void nilfs_abort_logs(struct list
 				}
 				break;
 			}
+			clear_buffer_async_write(bh);
 			if (bh->b_page != fs_page) {
 				nilfs_end_page_io(fs_page, err);
 				fs_page = bh->b_page;
@@ -1899,8 +1899,9 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write
 				 BIT(BH_Delay) | BIT(BH_NILFS_Volatile) |
 				 BIT(BH_NILFS_Redirected));
 
-			set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits);
 			if (bh == segbuf->sb_super_root) {
+				set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+				clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
 				if (bh->b_page != bd_page) {
 					end_page_writeback(bd_page);
 					bd_page = bh->b_page;
@@ -1908,6 +1909,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_complete_write
 				update_sr = true;
 				break;
 			}
+			set_mask_bits(&bh->b_state, clear_bits, set_bits);
 			if (bh->b_page != fs_page) {
 				nilfs_end_page_io(fs_page, 0);
 				fs_page = bh->b_page;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.10/nilfs2-fix-potential-bug-in-end_buffer_async_write.patch
queue-5.10/nilfs2-fix-data-corruption-in-dsync-block-recovery-for-small-block-sizes.patch
queue-5.10/nilfs2-fix-hang-in-nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers.patch
queue-5.10/nilfs2-replace-warn_ons-for-invalid-dat-metadata-block-requests.patch




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux