This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
can: j1939: prevent deadlock by changing j1939_socks_lock to rwlock
to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
can-j1939-prevent-deadlock-by-changing-j1939_socks_lock-to-rwlock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 6cdedc18ba7b9dacc36466e27e3267d201948c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:22:26 -0700
Subject: can: j1939: prevent deadlock by changing j1939_socks_lock to rwlock
From: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 6cdedc18ba7b9dacc36466e27e3267d201948c8d upstream.
The following 3 locks would race against each other, causing the
deadlock situation in the Syzbot bug report:
- j1939_socks_lock
- active_session_list_lock
- sk_session_queue_lock
A reasonable fix is to change j1939_socks_lock to an rwlock, since in
the rare situations where a write lock is required for the linked list
that j1939_socks_lock is protecting, the code does not attempt to
acquire any more locks. This would break the circular lock dependency,
where, for example, the current thread already locks j1939_socks_lock
and attempts to acquire sk_session_queue_lock, and at the same time,
another thread attempts to acquire j1939_socks_lock while holding
sk_session_queue_lock.
NOTE: This patch along does not fix the unregister_netdevice bug
reported by Syzbot; instead, it solves a deadlock situation to prepare
for one or more further patches to actually fix the Syzbot bug, which
appears to be a reference counting problem within the j1939 codebase.
Reported-by: <syzbot+1591462f226d9cbf0564@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721162226.8639-1-astrajoan@xxxxxxxxx
[mkl: remove unrelated newline change]
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h | 2 +-
net/can/j1939/main.c | 2 +-
net/can/j1939/socket.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
+++ b/net/can/j1939/j1939-priv.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct j1939_priv {
unsigned int tp_max_packet_size;
/* lock for j1939_socks list */
- spinlock_t j1939_socks_lock;
+ rwlock_t j1939_socks_lock;
struct list_head j1939_socks;
struct kref rx_kref;
--- a/net/can/j1939/main.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(st
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
j1939_tp_init(priv);
- spin_lock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ rwlock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->j1939_socks);
mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock);
--- a/net/can/j1939/socket.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
@@ -80,16 +80,16 @@ static void j1939_jsk_add(struct j1939_p
jsk->state |= J1939_SOCK_BOUND;
j1939_priv_get(priv);
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_add_tail(&jsk->list, &priv->j1939_socks);
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
}
static void j1939_jsk_del(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct j1939_sock *jsk)
{
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ write_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_del_init(&jsk->list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ write_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
j1939_priv_put(priv);
jsk->state &= ~J1939_SOCK_BOUND;
@@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ bool j1939_sk_recv_match(struct j1939_pr
struct j1939_sock *jsk;
bool match = false;
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
match = j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, skcb);
if (match)
break;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
return match;
}
@@ -344,11 +344,11 @@ void j1939_sk_recv(struct j1939_priv *pr
{
struct j1939_sock *jsk;
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
j1939_sk_recv_one(jsk, skb);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
}
static void j1939_sk_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
@@ -1080,12 +1080,12 @@ void j1939_sk_errqueue(struct j1939_sess
}
/* spread RX notifications to all sockets subscribed to this session */
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
if (j1939_sk_recv_match_one(jsk, &session->skcb))
__j1939_sk_errqueue(session, &jsk->sk, type);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
};
void j1939_sk_send_loop_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struc
struct j1939_sock *jsk;
int error_code = ENETDOWN;
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_lock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
jsk->sk.sk_err = error_code;
if (!sock_flag(&jsk->sk, SOCK_DEAD))
@@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ void j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(struc
j1939_sk_queue_drop_all(priv, jsk, error_code);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
+ read_unlock_bh(&priv->j1939_socks_lock);
}
static int j1939_sk_no_ioctlcmd(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from astrajoan@xxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.1/can-j1939-prevent-deadlock-by-changing-j1939_socks_lock-to-rwlock.patch
