Re: Patch "xhci: fix off by one check when adding a secondary interrupter." has been added to the 6.6-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:26:33AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> 
>     xhci: fix off by one check when adding a secondary interrupter.
> 
> to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
>     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> 
> The filename of the patch is:
>      xhci-fix-off-by-one-check-when-adding-a-secondary-in.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
> 
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
> 
> 
> 
> commit c845fa4315cb8501de56de8658d11ab5194c2f6b
> Author: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu Jan 25 17:27:35 2024 +0200
> 
>     xhci: fix off by one check when adding a secondary interrupter.
>     
>     [ Upstream commit 09f197225cbc35db8ac135659cdd21bc1e29bda0 ]
>     
>     The sanity check of interrupter index when adding a new interrupter is
>     off by one. intr_num needs to be smaller than xhci->max_interrupter to
>     fit the array of interrupters.
>     
>     Luckily this doesn't cause any real word harm as xhci_add_interrupter()
>     is always called with a intr_num value smaller than xhci->max_interrupters
>     in any current kernel.
>     
>     Should not be needed for stable as 6.7 kernel and older only supports
>     one interrupter, with intr_num always being zero.

As per this text, it's not needed in stable trees, so I'll go drop it
(which is why I didn't tag it.)

thanks,

greg k-h




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux