This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/amdkfd: Fix lock dependency warning with srcu
to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-amdkfd-fix-lock-dependency-warning-with-srcu.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
commit 2fda6a3ea5a59c5cd063d2be988247d5f346bed0
Author: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Dec 29 15:19:25 2023 -0500
drm/amdkfd: Fix lock dependency warning with srcu
[ Upstream commit 2a9de42e8d3c82c6990d226198602be44f43f340 ]
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock:
(srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0
but task is already holding lock:
((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x211/0x560
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x88/0x4f0
svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu]
svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu]
kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
-> #2 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu]
restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu]
restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu]
process_one_work+0x29b/0x560
worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0
-> #1 ((work_completion)(&(&process->restore_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__flush_work+0x88/0x4f0
__cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0
kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
__mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240
exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0
mmput+0x6a/0x120
do_exit+0x322/0xb90
do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80
-> #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510
lock_sync+0x5f/0x90
__synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0
__mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240
exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0
mmput+0x6a/0x120
svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu]
process_one_work+0x29b/0x560
worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
srcu --> &info->lock#2 --> (work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work));
lock(&info->lock#2);
lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work));
sync(srcu);
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
index 4ecc4be1a910..5188c4d2e7c0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
@@ -2241,8 +2241,10 @@ static void svm_range_deferred_list_work(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_unlock(&svms->lock);
mmap_write_unlock(mm);
- /* Pairs with mmget in svm_range_add_list_work */
- mmput(mm);
+ /* Pairs with mmget in svm_range_add_list_work. If dropping the
+ * last mm refcount, schedule release work to avoid circular locking
+ */
+ mmput_async(mm);
spin_lock(&svms->deferred_list_lock);
}
