Patch "wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192se: using calculate_bit_shift()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192se: using calculate_bit_shift()

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     wifi-rtlwifi-rtl8192se-using-calculate_bit_shift.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 41a566a611a22446c74c5e8617aa48d68821ef0c
Author: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Dec 19 14:57:37 2023 +0800

    wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192se: using calculate_bit_shift()
    
    [ Upstream commit ac32b9317063b101a8ff3d3e885f76f87a280419 ]
    
    Using calculate_bit_shift() to replace _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift().
    And fix the undefined bitwise shift behavior problem.
    
    Fixes: d15853163bea ("rtlwifi: rtl8192se: Merge phy routines")
    Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Link: https://msgid.link/20231219065739.1895666-10-suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c
index 63283d9e7485..cd735d61f630 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c
@@ -14,13 +14,6 @@
 #include "hw.h"
 #include "table.h"
 
-static u32 _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(u32 bitmask)
-{
-	u32 i = ffs(bitmask);
-
-	return i ? i - 1 : 32;
-}
-
 u32 rtl92s_phy_query_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask)
 {
 	struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
@@ -30,7 +23,7 @@ u32 rtl92s_phy_query_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask)
 		regaddr, bitmask);
 
 	originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr);
-	bitshift = _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+	bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 	returnvalue = (originalvalue & bitmask) >> bitshift;
 
 	rtl_dbg(rtlpriv, COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, "BBR MASK=0x%x Addr[0x%x]=0x%x\n",
@@ -52,7 +45,7 @@ void rtl92s_phy_set_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask,
 
 	if (bitmask != MASKDWORD) {
 		originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr);
-		bitshift = _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+		bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 		data = ((originalvalue & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift));
 	}
 
@@ -160,7 +153,7 @@ u32 rtl92s_phy_query_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path rfpath,
 
 	original_value = _rtl92s_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath, regaddr);
 
-	bitshift = _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+	bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 	readback_value = (original_value & bitmask) >> bitshift;
 
 	spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.rf_lock);
@@ -191,7 +184,7 @@ void rtl92s_phy_set_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path rfpath,
 	if (bitmask != RFREG_OFFSET_MASK) {
 		original_value = _rtl92s_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath,
 							    regaddr);
-		bitshift = _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+		bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 		data = ((original_value & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift));
 	}