Patch "bpf: Fix a verifier bug due to incorrect branch offset comparison with cpu=v4" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    bpf: Fix a verifier bug due to incorrect branch offset comparison with cpu=v4

to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bpf-fix-a-verifier-bug-due-to-incorrect-branch-offset-comparison-with-cpu-v4.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From dfce9cb3140592b886838e06f3e0c25fea2a9cae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:46:40 -0800
Subject: bpf: Fix a verifier bug due to incorrect branch offset comparison with cpu=v4

From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>

commit dfce9cb3140592b886838e06f3e0c25fea2a9cae upstream.

Bpf cpu=v4 support is introduced in [1] and Commit 4cd58e9af8b9
("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") added support for new
32bit offset jmp instruction. Unfortunately, in function
bpf_adj_delta_to_off(), for new branch insn with 32bit offset, the offset
(plus/minor a small delta) compares to 16-bit offset bound
[S16_MIN, S16_MAX], which caused the following verification failure:
  $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -t verif_scale_pyperf180
  ...
  insn 10 cannot be patched due to 16-bit range
  ...
  libbpf: failed to load object 'pyperf180.bpf.o'
  scale_test:FAIL:expect_success unexpected error: -12 (errno 12)
  #405     verif_scale_pyperf180:FAIL

Note that due to recent llvm18 development, the patch [2] (already applied
in bpf-next) needs to be applied to bpf tree for testing purpose.

The fix is rather simple. For 32bit offset branch insn, the adjusted
offset compares to [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] and then verification succeeded.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230728011143.3710005-1-yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx
  [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231110193644.3130906-1-yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx

Fixes: 4cd58e9af8b9 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231201024640.3417057-1-yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -365,14 +365,18 @@ static int bpf_adj_delta_to_imm(struct b
 static int bpf_adj_delta_to_off(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 pos, s32 end_old,
 				s32 end_new, s32 curr, const bool probe_pass)
 {
-	const s32 off_min = S16_MIN, off_max = S16_MAX;
+	s64 off_min, off_max, off;
 	s32 delta = end_new - end_old;
-	s32 off;
 
-	if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA))
+	if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA)) {
 		off = insn->imm;
-	else
+		off_min = S32_MIN;
+		off_max = S32_MAX;
+	} else {
 		off = insn->off;
+		off_min = S16_MIN;
+		off_max = S16_MAX;
+	}
 
 	if (curr < pos && curr + off + 1 >= end_old)
 		off += delta;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx are

queue-6.1/bpf-fix-a-verifier-bug-due-to-incorrect-branch-offset-comparison-with-cpu-v4.patch
queue-6.1/bpf-support-new-32bit-offset-jmp-instruction.patch




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux