Patch "ARM: sun9i: smp: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds read in sunxi_mc_smp_init" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ARM: sun9i: smp: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds read in sunxi_mc_smp_init

to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     arm-sun9i-smp-fix-array-index-out-of-bounds-read-in-.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 3ae1b877976a9bdf468827253f52e3f016778881
Author: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Dec 28 20:39:02 2023 +0100

    ARM: sun9i: smp: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds read in sunxi_mc_smp_init
    
    [ Upstream commit 72ad3b772b6d393701df58ba1359b0bb346a19ed ]
    
    Running a multi-arch kernel (multi_v7_defconfig) on a Raspberry Pi 3B+
    with enabled CONFIG_UBSAN triggers the following warning:
    
     UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c:810:29
     index 2 is out of range for type 'sunxi_mc_smp_data [2]'
     CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6-00248-g5254c0cbc92d
     Hardware name: BCM2835
      unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
      show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x4c
      dump_stack_lvl from ubsan_epilogue+0x8/0x34
      ubsan_epilogue from __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x78/0x80
      __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds from sunxi_mc_smp_init+0xe4/0x4cc
      sunxi_mc_smp_init from do_one_initcall+0xa0/0x2fc
      do_one_initcall from kernel_init_freeable+0xf4/0x2f4
      kernel_init_freeable from kernel_init+0x18/0x158
      kernel_init from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28
    
    Since the enabled method couldn't match with any entry from
    sunxi_mc_smp_data, the value of the index shouldn't be used right after
    the loop. So move it after the check of ret in order to have a valid
    index.
    
    Fixes: 1631090e34f5 ("ARM: sun9i: smp: Add is_a83t field")
    Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231228193903.9078-1-wahrenst@xxxxxxx
    Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
index 26cbce1353387..b2f5f4f28705f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
@@ -808,12 +808,12 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void)
 			break;
 	}
 
-	is_a83t = sunxi_mc_smp_data[i].is_a83t;
-
 	of_node_put(node);
 	if (ret)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	is_a83t = sunxi_mc_smp_data[i].is_a83t;
+
 	if (!sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_table_init())
 		return -EINVAL;
 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux