This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
rethook-use-__rcu-pointer-for-rethook-handler.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From a1461f1fd6cfdc4b8917c9d4a91e92605d1f28dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 14:53:56 +0900
Subject: rethook: Use __rcu pointer for rethook::handler
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit a1461f1fd6cfdc4b8917c9d4a91e92605d1f28dc upstream.
Since the rethook::handler is an RCU-maganged pointer so that it will
notice readers the rethook is stopped (unregistered) or not, it should
be an __rcu pointer and use appropriate functions to be accessed. This
will use appropriate memory barrier when accessing it. OTOH,
rethook::data is never changed, so we don't need to check it in
get_kretprobe().
NOTE: To avoid sparse warning, rethook::handler is defined by a raw
function pointer type with __rcu instead of rethook_handler_t.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/170126066201.398836.837498688669005979.stgit@devnote2/
Fixes: 54ecbe6f1ed5 ("rethook: Add a generic return hook")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311241808.rv9ceuAh-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
Tested-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/kprobes.h | 6 ++----
include/linux/rethook.h | 7 ++++++-
kernel/trace/rethook.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
@@ -202,10 +202,8 @@ extern int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBE_ON_RETHOOK
static nokprobe_inline struct kretprobe *get_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri)
{
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held(),
- "Kretprobe is accessed from instance under preemptive context");
-
- return (struct kretprobe *)READ_ONCE(ri->node.rethook->data);
+ /* rethook::data is non-changed field, so that you can access it freely. */
+ return (struct kretprobe *)ri->node.rethook->data;
}
static nokprobe_inline unsigned long get_kretprobe_retaddr(struct kretprobe_instance *ri)
{
--- a/include/linux/rethook.h
+++ b/include/linux/rethook.h
@@ -29,7 +29,12 @@ typedef void (*rethook_handler_t) (struc
*/
struct rethook {
void *data;
- rethook_handler_t handler;
+ /*
+ * To avoid sparse warnings, this uses a raw function pointer with
+ * __rcu, instead of rethook_handler_t. But this must be same as
+ * rethook_handler_t.
+ */
+ void (__rcu *handler) (struct rethook_node *, void *, unsigned long, struct pt_regs *);
struct freelist_head pool;
refcount_t ref;
struct rcu_head rcu;
--- a/kernel/trace/rethook.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/rethook.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void rethook_free_rcu(struct rcu_
*/
void rethook_stop(struct rethook *rh)
{
- WRITE_ONCE(rh->handler, NULL);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(rh->handler, NULL);
}
/**
@@ -78,11 +78,17 @@ void rethook_stop(struct rethook *rh)
*/
void rethook_free(struct rethook *rh)
{
- WRITE_ONCE(rh->handler, NULL);
+ rethook_stop(rh);
call_rcu(&rh->rcu, rethook_free_rcu);
}
+static inline rethook_handler_t rethook_get_handler(struct rethook *rh)
+{
+ return (rethook_handler_t)rcu_dereference_check(rh->handler,
+ rcu_read_lock_any_held());
+}
+
/**
* rethook_alloc() - Allocate struct rethook.
* @data: a data to pass the @handler when hooking the return.
@@ -102,7 +108,7 @@ struct rethook *rethook_alloc(void *data
}
rh->data = data;
- rh->handler = handler;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(rh->handler, handler);
rh->pool.head = NULL;
refcount_set(&rh->ref, 1);
@@ -142,9 +148,10 @@ static void free_rethook_node_rcu(struct
*/
void rethook_recycle(struct rethook_node *node)
{
- lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
+ rethook_handler_t handler;
- if (likely(READ_ONCE(node->rethook->handler)))
+ handler = rethook_get_handler(node->rethook);
+ if (likely(handler))
freelist_add(&node->freelist, &node->rethook->pool);
else
call_rcu(&node->rcu, free_rethook_node_rcu);
@@ -160,11 +167,9 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(rethook_recycle);
*/
struct rethook_node *rethook_try_get(struct rethook *rh)
{
- rethook_handler_t handler = READ_ONCE(rh->handler);
+ rethook_handler_t handler = rethook_get_handler(rh);
struct freelist_node *fn;
- lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
-
/* Check whether @rh is going to be freed. */
if (unlikely(!handler))
return NULL;
@@ -312,7 +317,7 @@ unsigned long rethook_trampoline_handler
rhn = container_of(first, struct rethook_node, llist);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rhn->frame != frame))
break;
- handler = READ_ONCE(rhn->rethook->handler);
+ handler = rethook_get_handler(rhn->rethook);
if (handler)
handler(rhn, rhn->rethook->data,
correct_ret_addr, regs);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.6/rethook-use-__rcu-pointer-for-rethook-handler.patch
