This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider
to the 6.5-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
clk-visconti-fix-undefined-behavior-bug-in-struct-visconti_pll_provider.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.5 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 5ad1e217a2b23aa046b241183bd9452d259d70d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:05:27 -0600
Subject: clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 5ad1e217a2b23aa046b241183bd9452d259d70d0 upstream.
`struct clk_hw_onecell_data` is a flexible structure, which means that
it contains flexible-array member at the bottom, in this case array
`hws`:
include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
1381 unsigned int num;
1382 struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
1383 };
This could potentially lead to an overwrite of the objects following
`clk_data` in `struct visconti_pll_provider`, in this case
`struct device_node *node;`, at run-time:
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
17 void __iomem *reg_base;
18 struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
19 struct device_node *node;
20 };
Notice that a total of 56 bytes are allocated for flexible-array `hws`
at line 328. See below:
include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tmpv770x.h:
14 #define TMPV770X_NR_PLL 7
drivers/clk/visconti/pll-tmpv770x.c:
69 ctx = visconti_init_pll(np, reg_base, TMPV770X_NR_PLL);
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c:
321 struct visconti_pll_provider * __init visconti_init_pll(struct device_node *np,
322 void __iomem *base,
323 unsigned long nr_plls)
324 {
325 struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx;
...
328 ctx = kzalloc(struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls), GFP_KERNEL);
`struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls)` above translates to
sizeof(struct visconti_pll_provider) + sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * 7 ==
24 + 8 * 7 == 24 + 56
^^^^
|
allocated bytes for flex array `hws`
$ pahole -C visconti_pll_provider drivers/clk/visconti/pll.o
struct visconti_pll_provider {
void * reg_base; /* 0 8 */
struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data; /* 8 8 */
struct device_node * node; /* 16 8 */
/* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
};
And then, after the allocation, some data is written into all members
of `struct visconti_pll_provider`:
332 for (i = 0; i < nr_plls; ++i)
333 ctx->clk_data.hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
334
335 ctx->node = np;
336 ctx->reg_base = base;
337 ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls;
Fix all these by placing the declaration of object `clk_data` at the
end of `struct visconti_pll_provider`. Also, add a comment to make it
clear that this object must always be last in the structure, and
prevent this bug from being introduced again in the future.
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end is coming in GCC-14, and we are getting
ready to enable it globally.
Fixes: b4cbe606dc36 ("clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver and reset driver")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/57a831d94ee2b3889b11525d4ad500356f89576f.1697492890.git.gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h
@@ -15,8 +15,10 @@
struct visconti_pll_provider {
void __iomem *reg_base;
- struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
struct device_node *node;
+
+ /* Must be last */
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
};
#define VISCONTI_PLL_RATE(_rate, _dacen, _dsmen, \
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.5/clk-visconti-fix-undefined-behavior-bug-in-struct-visconti_pll_provider.patch
queue-6.5/gcc-plugins-randstruct-only-warn-about-true-flexible.patch
queue-6.5/clk-socfpga-fix-undefined-behavior-bug-in-struct-stratix10_clock_data.patch
