This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mctp: perform route lookups under a RCU read-side lock
to the 6.5-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mctp-perform-route-lookups-under-a-rcu-read-side-lock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.5 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 5093bbfc10ab6636b32728e35813cbd79feb063c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:56:45 +0800
Subject: mctp: perform route lookups under a RCU read-side lock
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 5093bbfc10ab6636b32728e35813cbd79feb063c upstream.
Our current route lookups (mctp_route_lookup and mctp_route_lookup_null)
traverse the net's route list without the RCU read lock held. This means
the route lookup is subject to preemption, resulting in an potential
grace period expiry, and so an eventual kfree() while we still have the
route pointer.
Add the proper read-side critical section locks around the route
lookups, preventing premption and a possible parallel kfree.
The remaining net->mctp.routes accesses are already under a
rcu_read_lock, or protected by the RTNL for updates.
Based on an analysis from Sili Luo <rootlab@xxxxxxxxxx>, where
introducing a delay in the route lookup could cause a UAF on
simultaneous sendmsg() and route deletion.
Reported-by: Sili Luo <rootlab@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 889b7da23abf ("mctp: Add initial routing framework")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/29c4b0e67dc1bf3571df3982de87df90cae9b631.1696837310.git.jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/mctp/route.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mctp/route.c
+++ b/net/mctp/route.c
@@ -737,6 +737,8 @@ struct mctp_route *mctp_route_lookup(str
{
struct mctp_route *tmp, *rt = NULL;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp, &net->mctp.routes, list) {
/* TODO: add metrics */
if (mctp_rt_match_eid(tmp, dnet, daddr)) {
@@ -747,21 +749,29 @@ struct mctp_route *mctp_route_lookup(str
}
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
return rt;
}
static struct mctp_route *mctp_route_lookup_null(struct net *net,
struct net_device *dev)
{
- struct mctp_route *rt;
+ struct mctp_route *tmp, *rt = NULL;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(rt, &net->mctp.routes, list) {
- if (rt->dev->dev == dev && rt->type == RTN_LOCAL &&
- refcount_inc_not_zero(&rt->refs))
- return rt;
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp, &net->mctp.routes, list) {
+ if (tmp->dev->dev == dev && tmp->type == RTN_LOCAL &&
+ refcount_inc_not_zero(&tmp->refs)) {
+ rt = tmp;
+ break;
+ }
}
- return NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return rt;
}
static int mctp_do_fragment_route(struct mctp_route *rt, struct sk_buff *skb,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.5/mctp-perform-route-lookups-under-a-rcu-read-side-lock.patch
