Patch "btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert

to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-check-for-btrfs_fs_error-in-pending-ordered-assert.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:59:04 -0400
Subject: btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert

From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab upstream.

If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current
transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for.  This means we
expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the
ordered extent.  However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean
it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the
"ASSERT(trans)" check.  This is obviously incorrect, and the code
properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist.  Fix
this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have
BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system.

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ void btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(struct
 			refcount_inc(&trans->use_count);
 		spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
 
-		ASSERT(trans);
+		ASSERT(trans || BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info));
 		if (trans) {
 			if (atomic_dec_and_test(&trans->pending_ordered))
 				wake_up(&trans->pending_wait);


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx are

queue-6.1/btrfs-release-path-before-inode-lookup-during-the-ino-lookup-ioctl.patch
queue-6.1/btrfs-check-for-btrfs_fs_error-in-pending-ordered-assert.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux