This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
gpio: zynq: restore zynq_gpio_irq_reqres/zynq_gpio_irq_relres callbacks
to the 6.5-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
gpio-zynq-restore-zynq_gpio_irq_reqres-zynq_gpio_irq_relres-callbacks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.5 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From 180b10bd160b014448366e5bc86e0558f8acb74f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 14:24:24 +0200
Subject: gpio: zynq: restore zynq_gpio_irq_reqres/zynq_gpio_irq_relres callbacks
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 180b10bd160b014448366e5bc86e0558f8acb74f upstream.
Commit f56914393537 ("gpio: zynq: fix zynqmp_gpio not an immutable chip
warning") ditched the open-coded resource allocation handlers in favor
of the generic ones. These generic handlers don't maintain the PM
runtime anymore, which causes a regression in that level IRQs are no
longer reported.
Restore the original handlers to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: f56914393537 ("gpio: zynq: fix zynqmp_gpio not an immutable chip warning")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
index 0a7264aabe48..324e942c0650 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
@@ -575,6 +575,26 @@ static int zynq_gpio_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
return 0;
}
+static int zynq_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(chip->parent);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ return gpiochip_reqres_irq(chip, d->hwirq);
+}
+
+static void zynq_gpio_irq_relres(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+
+ gpiochip_relres_irq(chip, d->hwirq);
+ pm_runtime_put(chip->parent);
+}
+
/* irq chip descriptor */
static const struct irq_chip zynq_gpio_level_irqchip = {
.name = DRIVER_NAME,
@@ -584,9 +604,10 @@ static const struct irq_chip zynq_gpio_level_irqchip = {
.irq_unmask = zynq_gpio_irq_unmask,
.irq_set_type = zynq_gpio_set_irq_type,
.irq_set_wake = zynq_gpio_set_wake,
+ .irq_request_resources = zynq_gpio_irq_reqres,
+ .irq_release_resources = zynq_gpio_irq_relres,
.flags = IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED | IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED |
IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
- GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
};
static const struct irq_chip zynq_gpio_edge_irqchip = {
@@ -597,8 +618,9 @@ static const struct irq_chip zynq_gpio_edge_irqchip = {
.irq_unmask = zynq_gpio_irq_unmask,
.irq_set_type = zynq_gpio_set_irq_type,
.irq_set_wake = zynq_gpio_set_wake,
+ .irq_request_resources = zynq_gpio_irq_reqres,
+ .irq_release_resources = zynq_gpio_irq_relres,
.flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
- GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
};
static void zynq_gpio_handle_bank_irq(struct zynq_gpio *gpio,
--
2.42.0
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from daniel@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-6.5/gpio-zynq-restore-zynq_gpio_irq_reqres-zynq_gpio_irq_relres-callbacks.patch
