Patch "drm/amdgpu: Use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()" has been added to the 6.5-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    drm/amdgpu: Use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

to the 6.5-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     drm-amdgpu-use-seq_puts-instead-of-seq_printf.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.5 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 4950774d87ea3e2639c134f1ada9b5bdda54f3aa
Author: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Sun Jul 23 12:19:26 2023 +0530

    drm/amdgpu: Use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()
    
    [ Upstream commit fc8e55f378cf11f3abe25ec5cd67b6fc5e915a96 ]
    
    For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts()
    instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following warning.
    
    WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
    
    And other style fixes:
    
    WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
    WARNING: Block comments should align the * on each line
    
    Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
    Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@xxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
index ebeddc9a37e9b..6aa3b1d845abe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
  * Returns 0 on success, error on failure.
  */
 int amdgpu_ib_get(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
-		  unsigned size, enum amdgpu_ib_pool_type pool_type,
+		  unsigned int size, enum amdgpu_ib_pool_type pool_type,
 		  struct amdgpu_ib *ib)
 {
 	int r;
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void amdgpu_ib_free(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_ib *ib,
  * a CONST_IB), it will be put on the ring prior to the DE IB.  Prior
  * to SI there was just a DE IB.
  */
-int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned num_ibs,
+int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int num_ibs,
 		       struct amdgpu_ib *ibs, struct amdgpu_job *job,
 		       struct dma_fence **f)
 {
@@ -131,16 +131,16 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned num_ibs,
 	struct amdgpu_ib *ib = &ibs[0];
 	struct dma_fence *tmp = NULL;
 	bool need_ctx_switch;
-	unsigned patch_offset = ~0;
+	unsigned int patch_offset = ~0;
 	struct amdgpu_vm *vm;
 	uint64_t fence_ctx;
 	uint32_t status = 0, alloc_size;
-	unsigned fence_flags = 0;
+	unsigned int fence_flags = 0;
 	bool secure, init_shadow;
 	u64 shadow_va, csa_va, gds_va;
 	int vmid = AMDGPU_JOB_GET_VMID(job);
 
-	unsigned i;
+	unsigned int i;
 	int r = 0;
 	bool need_pipe_sync = false;
 
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned num_ibs,
 		amdgpu_ring_emit_gfx_shadow(ring, 0, 0, 0, false, 0);
 
 		if (ring->funcs->init_cond_exec) {
-			unsigned ce_offset = ~0;
+			unsigned int ce_offset = ~0;
 
 			ce_offset = amdgpu_ring_init_cond_exec(ring);
 			if (ce_offset != ~0 && ring->funcs->patch_cond_exec)
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ int amdgpu_ib_ring_tests(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 {
 	long tmo_gfx, tmo_mm;
 	int r, ret = 0;
-	unsigned i;
+	unsigned int i;
 
 	tmo_mm = tmo_gfx = AMDGPU_IB_TEST_TIMEOUT;
 	if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ int amdgpu_ib_ring_tests(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 		/* for CP & SDMA engines since they are scheduled together so
 		 * need to make the timeout width enough to cover the time
 		 * cost waiting for it coming back under RUNTIME only
-		*/
+		 */
 		tmo_gfx = 8 * AMDGPU_IB_TEST_TIMEOUT;
 	} else if (adev->gmc.xgmi.hive_id) {
 		tmo_gfx = AMDGPU_IB_TEST_GFX_XGMI_TIMEOUT;
@@ -465,13 +465,13 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_sa_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
 	struct amdgpu_device *adev = m->private;
 
-	seq_printf(m, "--------------------- DELAYED --------------------- \n");
+	seq_puts(m, "--------------------- DELAYED ---------------------\n");
 	amdgpu_sa_bo_dump_debug_info(&adev->ib_pools[AMDGPU_IB_POOL_DELAYED],
 				     m);
-	seq_printf(m, "-------------------- IMMEDIATE -------------------- \n");
+	seq_puts(m, "-------------------- IMMEDIATE --------------------\n");
 	amdgpu_sa_bo_dump_debug_info(&adev->ib_pools[AMDGPU_IB_POOL_IMMEDIATE],
 				     m);
-	seq_printf(m, "--------------------- DIRECT ---------------------- \n");
+	seq_puts(m, "--------------------- DIRECT ----------------------\n");
 	amdgpu_sa_bo_dump_debug_info(&adev->ib_pools[AMDGPU_IB_POOL_DIRECT], m);
 
 	return 0;



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux