Patch "sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value" has been added to the 6.5-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value

to the 6.5-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     sched-rt-fix-sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice-intial-value.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.5 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit c66b6b94664bee9f7f3028bb5143e824362c9e6e
Author: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Aug 2 17:19:05 2023 +0200

    sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value
    
    [ Upstream commit c7fcb99877f9f542c918509b2801065adcaf46fa ]
    
    There is a 10% rounding error in the intial value of the
    sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice with CONFIG_HZ_300=y.
    
    This was found with LTP test sched_rr_get_interval01:
    
    sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
    sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
    sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
    sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
    sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
    sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
    
    What this test does is to compare the return value from the
    sched_rr_get_interval() and the sched_rr_timeslice_ms sysctl file and
    fails if they do not match.
    
    The problem it found is the intial sysctl file value which was computed as:
    
    static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
    
    which works fine as long as MSEC_PER_SEC is multiple of HZ, however it
    introduces 10% rounding error for CONFIG_HZ_300:
    
    (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (100 * HZ / 1000)
    
    (1000 / 300) * (100 * 300 / 1000)
    
    3 * 30 = 90
    
    This can be easily fixed by reversing the order of the multiplication
    and division. After this fix we get:
    
    (MSEC_PER_SEC * (100 * HZ / 1000)) / HZ
    
    (1000 * (100 * 300 / 1000)) / 300
    
    (1000 * 30) / 300 = 100
    
    Fixes: 975e155ed873 ("sched/rt: Show the 'sched_rr_timeslice' SCHED_RR timeslice tuning knob in milliseconds")
    Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@xxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
    Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
    Tested-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230802151906.25258-2-chrubis@xxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 00e0e50741153..185d3d749f6b6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_period = 1000000;
 int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime = 950000;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
-static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
+static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC * RR_TIMESLICE) / HZ;
 static int sched_rt_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
 		size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
 static int sched_rr_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux