Patch "btrfs: fix BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance" has been added to the 5.15-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    btrfs: fix BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance

to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-fix-bug_on-condition-in-btrfs_cancel_balance.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.15 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 29eefa6d0d07e185f7bfe9576f91e6dba98189c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 02:55:59 -0400
Subject: btrfs: fix BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance

From: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 29eefa6d0d07e185f7bfe9576f91e6dba98189c2 upstream.

Pausing and canceling balance can race to interrupt balance lead to BUG_ON
panic in btrfs_cancel_balance. The BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance
does not take this race scenario into account.

However, the race condition has no other side effects. We can fix that.

Reproducing it with panic trace like this:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4618!
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_cancel_balance+0x5cf/0x6a0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? do_nanosleep+0x60/0x120
   ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0xb7/0x1a0
   ? sched_core_clone_cookie+0x70/0x70
   btrfs_ioctl_balance_ctl+0x55/0x70
   btrfs_ioctl+0xa46/0xd20
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7d/0xa0
   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  Race scenario as follows:
  > mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  > --------------------
  > .......issue pause and cancel req in another thread
  > --------------------
  > ret = __btrfs_balance(fs_info);
  >
  > mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  > if (ret == -ECANCELED && atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_pause_req)) {
  >         btrfs_info(fs_info, "balance: paused");
  >         btrfs_exclop_balance(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED);
  > }

CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4636,8 +4636,7 @@ int btrfs_cancel_balance(struct btrfs_fs
 		}
 	}
 
-	BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl ||
-		test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
+	ASSERT(!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
 	atomic_dec(&fs_info->balance_cancel_req);
 	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
 	return 0;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from xiaoshoukui@xxxxxxxxx are

queue-5.15/btrfs-fix-bug_on-condition-in-btrfs_cancel_balance.patch



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux